Suppr超能文献

在服用阿司匹林期间发生突破性中风后,氯吡格雷是否比阿司匹林更好?一项回顾性队列研究。

Is clopidogrel better than aspirin following breakthrough strokes while on aspirin? A retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Lee Meng, Wu Yi-Ling, Saver Jeffrey L, Lee Hsuei-Chen, Lee Jiann-Der, Chang Ku-Chou, Wu Chih-Ying, Lee Tsong-Hai, Wang Hui-Hsuan, Rao Neal M, Ovbiagele Bruce

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi Branch, Puzi, Taiwan.

Department of Neurology, Stroke Center, Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 2;4(12):e006672. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006672.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

There is insufficient evidence on which to base a recommendation for optimal antiplatelet therapy following a stroke while on aspirin. The objective was to compare clopidogrel initiation vs aspirin reinitiation for vascular risk reduction among patients with ischaemic stroke on aspirin at the time of their index stroke.

DESIGN

Retrospective.

SETTING

We conducted a nationwide cohort study by retrieving all hospitalised patients (≥18 years) with a primary diagnosis of ischaemic stroke between 2003 and 2009 from Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database.

PARTICIPANTS

Among 3862 patients receiving aspirin before the index ischaemic stroke and receiving either aspirin or clopidogrel after index stroke during follow-up period, 1623 were excluded due to a medication possession ratio <80%. Also, 355 were excluded due to history of atrial fibrillation, valvular heart disease or coagulopathy. Therefore, 1884 patients were included in our final analysis.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were categorised into two groups based on whether clopidogrel or aspirin was prescribed during the follow-up period. Follow-up was from time of the index stroke to admission for recurrent stroke or myocardial infarction, death or the end of 2010.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary end point was hospitalisation due to a new-onset major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE: composite of any stroke or myocardial infarction). The leading secondary end point was any recurrent stroke.

RESULTS

Compared to aspirin, clopidogrel was associated with a lower occurrence of future MACE (HR=0.54, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.68, p<0.001, number needed to treat: 8) and recurrent stroke (HR=0.54, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.69, p<0.001, number needed to treat: 9) after adjustment of relevant covariates.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with an ischaemic stroke while taking aspirin, clopidogrel initiation was associated with fewer recurrent vascular events than aspirin reinitiation.

摘要

目的

目前尚无足够证据为正在服用阿司匹林的中风患者推荐最佳抗血小板治疗方案。本研究旨在比较在首次中风时正在服用阿司匹林的缺血性中风患者中,起始使用氯吡格雷与重新使用阿司匹林对降低血管风险的效果。

设计

回顾性研究。

研究背景

我们通过检索台湾国民健康保险研究数据库中2003年至2009年期间所有主要诊断为缺血性中风的住院患者(≥18岁),进行了一项全国性队列研究。

研究对象

在3862例首次缺血性中风前服用阿司匹林且在随访期间首次中风后服用阿司匹林或氯吡格雷的患者中,1623例因药物持有率<80%被排除。另外,355例因有房颤、瓣膜性心脏病或凝血病病史被排除。因此,1884例患者纳入最终分析。

干预措施

根据随访期间是否开具氯吡格雷或阿司匹林,将患者分为两组。随访时间从首次中风至再次中风或心肌梗死入院、死亡或2010年底。

主要和次要结局指标

主要终点是因新发主要不良心血管事件(MACE:任何中风或心肌梗死的复合事件)住院。主要次要终点是任何复发性中风。

结果

与阿司匹林相比,在调整相关协变量后,氯吡格雷与未来MACE发生率较低相关(HR=0.54,95%CI 0.43至0.68,p<0.001,需治疗人数:8),与复发性中风发生率较低相关(HR=0.54,95%CI 0.42至0.69,p<0.001,需治疗人数:9)。

结论

在服用阿司匹林的缺血性中风患者中,起始使用氯吡格雷比重新使用阿司匹林与更少的复发性血管事件相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/731e/4256539/bdd6da72d837/bmjopen2014006672f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验