Kristensen T, Jensen C, Østergaard S, Weisbjerg M R, Aaes O, Nielsen N I
Department of Agroecology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, PO Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark.
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, PO Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark.
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Jan;98(1):263-74. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8532. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
The objective of this paper was to compare efficiency measures, milk production, and feed intake for lactating cows in commercial herds using different breeds and production and milking systems. To accomplish this, we used all feed evaluations made by the Danish extension service during the period November 2012 to April 2013 for 779 herds, of which 508 were Holstein-Friesian (HOL); 100 were Jersey (JER); and 171 herds were a mixture of these 2 breeds, other dairy breeds, and crossbreeds (OTH). The annually recorded, herd-average energy-corrected milk (ECM) yield was 8,716kg (JER) and 9,606kg (HOL); and average herd size was 197 cows (HOL) and 224 cows (JER). All cows were fed a total mixed or partial mixed ration supplemented with concentrate from feeding stations, housed in loose housing systems with a slatted floor, and milked in either a parlor milking unit or an automatic milking system. Energy efficiency was calculated as net energy efficiency defined as total energy demand as a percentage of energy intake and as residual feed intake defined as energy intake (net energy for lactation; NEL) minus energy requirement. Production efficiency was expressed as kilograms of ECM per kilogram of dry matter intake (DMI), kilograms of ECM per 10 MJ of net energy intake (NEL), kilograms of ECM per 100kg of BW, and kilograms of DMI per 100kg of BW. Environmental efficiency was expressed by the nitrogen efficiency calculated as N in milk and meat as a percentage of N in intake, and as enteric emission of methane expressed as kilograms of ECM per megajoule of CH4. Mean milk yield for lactating cows was 30.4kg of ECM in HOL and 3kg less in JER, with OTH herds in between. Mean NEL intake was 122 MJ in JER, increasing to 147 MJ in HOL, whereas ration energy density between breeds did not differ (6.4-6.5 MJ of NEL per kg of DMI). The NEL intake and DMI explained 56 and 47%, respectively, of variation in production (ECM) for HOL herds but only 44 and 27% for JER. Jersey had a higher efficiency than HOL and OTH, except in nitrogen efficiency, where no significant difference between breeds existed. Most of the efficiency measures were internally significantly correlated and in general highly positively correlated with milk production, whereas the correlation to DMI was less positive and for JER negative for net energy efficiency, kilograms of ECM per kilogram of DMI, and nitrogen efficiency. Only little of the variation in efficiency between herds could be explained by differences in nutrient or roughage content of DMI. This could be explained by the fact that data were collected from herds purchasing feed planning and evaluation from the extension service.
本文的目的是比较不同品种、生产和挤奶系统的商业牛群中泌乳奶牛的效率指标、产奶量和采食量。为此,我们使用了丹麦推广服务机构在2012年11月至2013年4月期间对779个牛群所做的所有饲料评估,其中508个是荷斯坦 - 弗里生牛群(HOL);100个是泽西牛群(JER);171个牛群是这两个品种、其他奶牛品种和杂交品种的混合群体(OTH)。每年记录的牛群平均能量校正奶(ECM)产量,泽西牛群为8716千克,荷斯坦 - 弗里生牛群为9606千克;平均牛群规模,荷斯坦 - 弗里生牛群为197头奶牛,泽西牛群为224头奶牛。所有奶牛都饲喂全混合或部分混合日粮,并从饲喂站补充精饲料,饲养在带有漏缝地板的散栏式牛舍中,并在挤奶厅挤奶单元或自动挤奶系统中挤奶。能量效率计算为净能量效率,定义为总能量需求占能量摄入量的百分比,以及剩余采食量,定义为能量摄入量(泌乳净能量;NEL)减去能量需求。生产效率表示为每千克干物质摄入量(DMI)的ECM千克数、每10兆焦净能量摄入量(NEL)的ECM千克数、每100千克体重的ECM千克数以及每100千克体重的DMI千克数。环境效率通过氮效率表示,计算为牛奶和肉类中的氮占摄入量中氮的百分比,以及甲烷的肠道排放量,表示为每兆焦耳CH4的ECM千克数。泌乳奶牛的平均产奶量,荷斯坦 - 弗里生牛群为30.4千克ECM,泽西牛群少3千克,OTH牛群介于两者之间。泽西牛群的平均NEL摄入量为122兆焦,荷斯坦 - 弗里生牛群增加到147兆焦,而不同品种之间的日粮能量密度没有差异(每千克DMI含6.4 - 6.5兆焦NEL)。NEL摄入量和DMI分别解释了荷斯坦 - 弗里生牛群生产(ECM)变化的56%和47%,但泽西牛群仅为44%和27%。除了氮效率(各品种之间无显著差异)外,泽西牛的效率高于荷斯坦 - 弗里生牛和OTH牛群。大多数效率指标在内部显著相关,并且总体上与产奶量高度正相关,而与DMI的相关性较不积极,对于泽西牛群,净能量效率、每千克DMI的ECM千克数和氮效率与DMI呈负相关。牛群之间效率差异中只有很少一部分可以通过DMI的营养成分或粗饲料含量差异来解释。这可以通过以下事实来解释,即数据是从向推广服务机构购买饲料计划和评估的牛群中收集的。