Kiefer Lukas, Menzel Friederike, Bahrs Enno
Department of Farm Management, Schloss Osthof Süd, Hohenheim University, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany.
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Dec;97(12):7564-74. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8284. Epub 2014 Oct 25.
The reduction of product-related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in milk production appears to be necessary. The reduction of emissions on an individual farm might be highly accepted by farm owners if it were accompanied by an increase in profitability. Using life cycle assessments to determine the product carbon footprints (PCF) and farm-level evaluations to record profitability, we explored opportunities for optimization based on analysis of 81 organic and conventional pasture-based dairy farms in southern Germany. The objective of the present study was to detect common determining factors for low PCF and high management incomes (MI) to achieve GHG reductions at the lowest possible operational cost. In our sample, organic farms, which performed economically better than conventional farms, produced PCF that were significantly higher than those produced by conventional farms [1.61 ± 0.29 vs. 1.45 ± 0.28 kg of CO₂ equivalents (CO₂eq) per kg of milk; means ± SD)]. A multiple linear regression analysis of the sample demonstrated that low feed demand per kilogram of milk, high grassland yield, and low forage area requirements per cow are the main factors that decrease PCF. These factors are also useful for improving a farm's profitability in principle. For organic farms, a reduction of feed demand of 100 g/kg of milk resulted in a PCF reduction of 105 g of CO₂eq/kg of milk and an increase in MI of approximately 2.1 euro cents (c)/kg of milk. For conventional farms, a decrease of feed demand of 100 g/kg of milk corresponded to a reduction in PCF of 117 g of CO₂eq/kg of milk and an increase in MI of approximately 3.1 c/kg of milk. Accordingly, farmers could achieve higher profits while reducing GHG emissions. Improved education and training of farmers and consultants regarding GHG mitigation and farm profitability appear to be the best methods of improving efficiency under traditional and organic farming practices.
减少牛奶生产中与产品相关的温室气体(GHG)排放似乎很有必要。如果能在减少单个农场排放的同时提高盈利能力,农场主可能会高度接受这种做法。我们利用生命周期评估来确定产品碳足迹(PCF),并通过农场层面的评估来记录盈利能力,基于对德国南部81个有机和传统牧场型奶牛场的分析,探索了优化机会。本研究的目的是找出低PCF和高管理收入(MI)的共同决定因素,以便以尽可能低的运营成本实现温室气体减排。在我们的样本中,经济表现优于传统农场的有机农场,其生产的PCF显著高于传统农场[每千克牛奶1.61±0.29 vs. 1.45±0.28千克二氧化碳当量(CO₂eq);均值±标准差]。对样本进行的多元线性回归分析表明,每千克牛奶的低饲料需求、高草地产量以及每头奶牛的低草料面积需求是降低PCF的主要因素。从原则上讲,这些因素对提高农场盈利能力也很有用。对于有机农场,每千克牛奶的饲料需求减少100克,可使PCF降低105克CO₂eq/千克牛奶,MI增加约2.1欧分/千克牛奶。对于传统农场,每千克牛奶的饲料需求减少100克,对应PCF降低117克CO₂eq/千克牛奶,MI增加约3.1欧分/千克牛奶。因此,农民可以在减少温室气体排放的同时获得更高的利润。加强对农民和顾问在温室气体减排及农场盈利能力方面的教育和培训,似乎是在传统和有机养殖方式下提高效率的最佳方法。