Welander Michelle Hanna, Keller Sheila D, Northington LaDonna
Author Affiliations: Chief Nursing and Clinical Services Officer (Dr Welander), Children's of Mississippi; Associate Professor of Nursing and Senior Director of Research and Evidence-Based Practice (Dr Keller) and Professor of Nursing and Director of Traditional Undergraduate Studies (Dr Northington), School of Nursing, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson.
Clin Nurse Spec. 2015 Jan-Feb;29(1):38-47. doi: 10.1097/NUR.0000000000000097.
The highly complex pediatric patients with congenital heart disease require interprofessional teamwork and collaboration to ensure high-quality outcomes with low mortality and morbidity (Congenit Heart Dis. 2013;8:3-19). The purpose of this study was to conduct an impact evaluation for a newly formed pediatric cardiac intensive care unit (PCICU) and to answer: Is there a difference between the pediatric intensive care unit and the PCICU on clinical outcome measures of pediatric cardiac postoperative patients and nursing resources?
A retrospective pretest/posttest design was used with the independent variables being type of intensive care unit. The confounding variables included demographic data, clinical outcome data, registered nurse (RN) staffing data, and RN turnover data.
The setting was a large, level I pediatric medical and surgical intensive care unit (ICU) located at a children's hospital within an academic medical center.
The population was pediatric cardiac postoperative patients. Patients excluded were those older than 18 years or cases without a Society of Thoracic Surgeons and European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery Congenital Heart Surgery Mortality Category score of 1 through 5.
Owen's impact evaluation method and descriptive statistical measures, t test and Pearson χ test, were used for analysis.
Demographic data were comparable between the pediatric intensive care unit (n = 296) and PCICU (n = 333). No statistical differences were found in several of the clinical outcome measures. Statistically significant differences were found in surgeon (P = .00) and RN nursing hours per patient day for all cardiac patients (P = .01). The PCICU time frame had a higher RN turnover rate.
The majority of quality measures were not statistically different between the 2 ICUs. Even though statistical significance was not reached, the clinical impact of the PCICU's reduction in patient infections, mortality, and ICU length of stay was noted.
This evaluation has provided organizational leaders the quality indicators and costs that have been impacted with the addition of interprofessional teamwork and coordination of care through the development of a PCICU.
患有先天性心脏病的儿科患者情况高度复杂,需要跨专业团队合作以确保获得高质量治疗效果,降低死亡率和发病率(《先天性心脏病》。2013年;8:3 - 19)。本研究的目的是对新成立的儿科心脏重症监护病房(PCICU)进行影响评估,并回答:儿科重症监护病房与PCICU在儿科心脏术后患者的临床结局指标和护理资源方面是否存在差异?
采用回顾性预测试/后测试设计,自变量为重症监护病房类型。混杂变量包括人口统计学数据、临床结局数据、注册护士(RN)人员配置数据和RN离职率数据。
研究地点为一所学术医疗中心内儿童医院的大型一级儿科医疗和外科重症监护病房(ICU)。
研究对象为儿科心脏术后患者。排除年龄超过18岁的患者或胸外科医师协会和欧洲心胸外科协会先天性心脏病手术死亡率类别评分不在1至5分之间的病例。
采用欧文影响评估方法以及描述性统计量、t检验和Pearson χ检验进行分析。
儿科重症监护病房(n = 296)和PCICU(n = 333)的人口统计学数据具有可比性。在多项临床结局指标中未发现统计学差异。在外科医生方面(P = .00)以及所有心脏患者的每位患者每日RN护理时长方面(P = .01)发现了统计学显著差异。PCICU时间段的RN离职率更高。
两个ICU之间的大多数质量指标在统计学上没有差异。尽管未达到统计学显著性,但注意到PCICU在降低患者感染、死亡率和ICU住院时长方面的临床影响。
该评估为组织领导者提供了质量指标和成本信息,这些指标和成本受到通过建立PCICU增加跨专业团队合作和护理协调的影响。