Bigliazzi Renato, Franchi Lorenzo, Bertoz André Pinheiro de Magalhães, McNamara James A, Faltin Kurt, Bertoz Francisco Antonio
a PhD Candidate in Orthodontics, Department of Pediatric and Social Dentistry, Dental School of Araçatuba, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil, and Adjunct Professor, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University Paulista, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil.
b Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy, and Thomas M. Graber Visiting Scholar, Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Angle Orthod. 2015 Sep;85(5):790-8. doi: 10.2319/080714-554.1. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
To evaluate the long-term effects of the standard (Class II) Balters bionator in growing patients with Class II malocclusion with mandibular retrusion by using morphometrics (thin-plate spline [TPS] analysis).
Twenty-three Class II patients (8 male, 15 female) were treated consecutively with the Balters bionator (bionator group). The sample was evaluated at T0, start of treatment; T1, end of bionator therapy; and T2, long-term observation (including fixed appliances). Mean age at the start of treatment was 10 years 2 months (T0); at posttreatment, 12 years 3 months (T1); and at long-term follow-up, 18 years 2 months (T2). The control group consisted of 22 subjects (11 male, 11 female) with untreated Class II malocclusion. Lateral cephalograms were analyzed at the three time points for all groups. TPS analysis evaluated statistical differences (permutation tests) in the craniofacial shape and size between the bionator and control groups.
TPS analysis showed that treatment with the bionator is able to produce favorable mandibular shape changes (forward and downward displacement) that contribute significantly to the correction of the Class II dentoskeletal imbalance. These results are maintained at a long-term observation after completion of growth. The control group showed no statistically significant differences in the correction of Class II malocclusion.
This study suggests that bionator treatment of Class II malocclusion produces favorable results over the long term with a combination of skeletal and dentoalveolar shape changes.
通过形态计量学(薄板样条分析法)评估标准(II 类)Balters 生物调节器对生长发育期 II 类错牙合伴下颌后缩患者的长期疗效。
连续纳入 23 例 II 类患者(8 例男性,15 例女性),采用 Balters 生物调节器进行治疗(生物调节器组)。在治疗开始时(T0)、生物调节器治疗结束时(T1)以及长期观察时(T2,包括使用固定矫治器阶段)对样本进行评估。治疗开始时的平均年龄为 10 岁 2 个月(T0);治疗后为 12 岁 3 个月(T1);长期随访时为 18 岁 2 个月(T2)。对照组由 22 例未经治疗的 II 类错牙合患者组成(11 例男性,11 例女性)。在三个时间点对所有组的头颅侧位片进行分析。薄板样条分析法评估生物调节器组与对照组在颅面形状和大小方面的统计学差异(置换检验)。
薄板样条分析法显示,使用生物调节器治疗能够产生有利的下颌形状改变(向前和向下移位),这对纠正 II 类牙颌面不调有显著作用。这些结果在生长发育完成后的长期观察中得以维持。对照组在 II 类错牙合的纠正方面无统计学显著差异。
本研究表明,生物调节器治疗 II 类错牙合在长期内可产生有利效果,伴有骨骼和牙牙槽形状的改变。