Kuwata Y, Tanimoto S, Sawabe E, Shima M, Takahashi Y, Ushizawa H, Fujie T, Koike R, Tojo N, Kubota T, Saito R
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Graduate School of Health Care Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8510, Japan.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015 Apr;34(4):763-72. doi: 10.1007/s10096-014-2290-9. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
Clostridium difficile infection control strategies require an understanding of its epidemiology. In this study, we analysed the toxin genotypes of 130 non-duplicate clinical isolates of C. difficile from a university hospital in Tokyo, Japan. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and eBURST analysis were performed for these isolates and nine strains previously analysed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) ribotyping. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for six antibiotics, and the bacterial resistance mechanisms were investigated. Ninety-five toxigenic strains (73%), including seven tcdA-negative, tcdB-positive and cdtA/cdtB-negative strains (A(-)B(+)CDT(-)) and three A(+)B(+)CDT(+) strains, and 35 (27%) non-toxigenic strains, were classified into 23 and 12 sequence types, respectively. Of these, sequence type (ST)17 (21.8%) was the most predominant. MLST and eBURST analysis showed that 139 strains belonged to seven groups and singletons, and most A(+)B(+)CDT(-) strains (98%, 89/91) were classified into group 1. All isolates were susceptible to metronidazole, vancomycin and meropenem; the ceftriaxone, clindamycin and ciprofloxacin resistance rates were 49, 59 and 99%, respectively. Resistance rates to ceftriaxone and clindamycin were higher in toxigenic strains than in non-toxigenic strains (P < 0.001). All ST17 and ST81 strains were resistant to these antibiotics. The clindamycin- and fluoroquinolone-resistant strains carried erm(B) and mutations in GyrA and/or GyrB, respectively. To our knowledge, this is the first MLST-based study of the molecular epidemiology of toxigenic and non-toxigenic strains in Japan, providing evidence that non-toxigenic and toxigenic strains exhibit high genetic diversity and that toxigenic strains are more likely than non-toxigenic strains to exhibit multidrug resistance.
艰难梭菌感染控制策略需要了解其流行病学情况。在本研究中,我们分析了来自日本东京一家大学医院的130株非重复艰难梭菌临床分离株的毒素基因型。对这些分离株以及之前通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)核糖体分型分析的9株菌株进行了多位点序列分型(MLST)和eBURST分析。测定了六种抗生素的最低抑菌浓度(MIC),并研究了细菌的耐药机制。95株产毒菌株(73%),包括7株tcdA阴性、tcdB阳性且cdtA/cdtB阴性的菌株(A(-)B(+)CDT(-))和3株A(+)B(+)CDT(+)菌株,以及35株(27%)非产毒菌株,分别被分为23种和12种序列类型。其中,序列类型(ST)17(21.8%)最为常见。MLST和eBURST分析表明,139株菌株属于7个组和单株,大多数A(+)B(+)CDT(-)菌株(98%,89/91)被归入第1组。所有分离株对甲硝唑、万古霉素和美罗培南敏感;头孢曲松、克林霉素和环丙沙星的耐药率分别为49%、59%和99%。产毒菌株对头孢曲松和克林霉素的耐药率高于非产毒菌株(P < 0.001)。所有ST17和ST81菌株对这些抗生素均耐药。克林霉素和氟喹诺酮耐药菌株分别携带erm(B)以及GyrA和/或GyrB的突变。据我们所知,这是日本首次基于MLST的产毒和非产毒菌株分子流行病学研究,提供了证据表明非产毒和产毒菌株具有高度的遗传多样性,并且产毒菌株比非产毒菌株更易表现出多重耐药性。