• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

首次非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)的结局和转归模式:社区医院与三级医院的比较。

Outcomes and transfer patterns for first Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI): comparisons between community and tertiary care hospitals.

机构信息

Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Providence Health Care Research Institute, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Cardiol. 2014 Dec;30(12):1562-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.09.008. Epub 2014 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.cjca.2014.09.008
PMID:25475461
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transfer patterns, procedure rates, and outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) presenting to Canadian community hospitals are not well understood.

METHODS

We documented all patients admitted to British Columbia (BC) hospitals with a primary diagnosis of NSTEMI between 2007 and 2008. Patients were divided by admitting hospital type into tertiary care hospitals, nonremote community hospitals, and remote community hospitals. The aims were to compare transfer rates and time to transfer to a tertiary hospital as well as procedure rates and outcomes at index admission, at 30 days, and at 1 year.

RESULTS

The mean transfer rates to a tertiary hospital were 72.6% for nonremote and 57.1% for remote community hospitals (P < 0.001). Times to and rates of cardiac procedures differed significantly among these 3 hospital types. Admission to a nonremote or remote community hospital was associated with similar 1-year mortality compared with admission to a tertiary care hospital (nonremote hospitals, adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.87; P = 0.26; remote hospitals, adjusted OR, 1.19; P = 0.33). At 1 year, admission to a nonremote community hospital was associated with a lower composite outcome of death or readmission for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (adjusted OR, 0.80; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

One-year mortality rates were not different between patients with NSTEMI admitted to BC community and tertiary care hospitals; however, the rate of readmission for AMI/death was significantly less in patients admitted to nonremote community hospitals. This should prompt the evaluation of key outcomes in NSTEMI in other community hospital settings.

摘要

背景

加拿大社区医院收治的非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者的转院模式、治疗率和预后情况尚不清楚。

方法

我们记录了 2007 年至 2008 年期间不列颠哥伦比亚省(BC)所有因 NSTEMI 住院的患者。根据入院医院类型,患者分为三级护理医院、非偏远社区医院和偏远社区医院。目的是比较转院率和转至三级医院的时间,以及在指数入院、30 天和 1 年时的治疗率和预后。

结果

非偏远社区医院和偏远社区医院的平均转院至三级医院的比例分别为 72.6%和 57.1%(P < 0.001)。这 3 种医院类型的转院时间和心脏介入治疗率存在显著差异。与入住三级护理医院相比,入住非偏远或偏远社区医院的 1 年死亡率相似(非偏远医院校正优势比[OR]为 0.87,P = 0.26;偏远医院校正 OR 为 1.19,P = 0.33)。1 年后,与入住三级护理医院相比,入住非偏远社区医院的患者死亡或因急性心肌梗死(AMI)再入院的复合结局发生率更低(校正 OR 为 0.80,P = 0.04)。

结论

在不列颠哥伦比亚省社区和三级护理医院接受 NSTEMI 治疗的患者的 1 年死亡率无差异,但与入住三级护理医院的患者相比,入住非偏远社区医院的患者因 AMI/死亡再次入院的比率显著降低。这应促使人们在其他社区医院环境中评估 NSTEMI 的关键结局。

相似文献

1
Outcomes and transfer patterns for first Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI): comparisons between community and tertiary care hospitals.首次非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)的结局和转归模式:社区医院与三级医院的比较。
Can J Cardiol. 2014 Dec;30(12):1562-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.09.008. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
2
Patterns of transfer for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome from community to tertiary care hospitals.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者从社区医院转诊至三级医院的模式。
Am Heart J. 2008 Jul;156(1):185-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.01.033. Epub 2008 Apr 14.
3
Influence of transfer-in rates on quality of care and outcomes at receiving hospitals in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.在非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,转入率对接收医院的医疗质量和结局的影响。
Am Heart J. 2010 Sep;160(3):405-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.06.025.
4
Long-term prognosis of first myocardial infarction according to the electrocardiographic pattern (ST elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction and non-classified myocardial infarction) and revascularization procedures.根据心电图模式(ST 段抬高型心肌梗死、非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死和未分类型心肌梗死)和血运重建术对首次心肌梗死的长期预后进行评估。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Oct 15;108(8):1061-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.06.003. Epub 2011 Jul 24.
5
Transfer rates from nonprocedure hospitals after initial admission and outcomes among elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction.非手术医院老年急性心肌梗死患者初始住院后的转归及其预后
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Feb 1;174(2):213-22. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.11944.
6
My MI; here or there, I get great care: is tertiary-care hospital acute myocardial infarction management really better?我的心肌梗死;无论在这儿还是那儿,我都得到了很好的治疗:三级医院对急性心肌梗死的治疗真的更好吗?
Can J Cardiol. 2014 Dec;30(12):1503-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.10.007. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
7
Do patients treated at academic hospitals have better longitudinal outcomes after admission for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction?非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者住院后,在学术医院接受治疗是否会有更好的纵向结局?
Am Heart J. 2014 May;167(5):762-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.01.009. Epub 2014 Feb 22.
8
Trends in presenting characteristics and hospital mortality among patients with ST elevation and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction from 1990 to 2006.1990年至2006年国家心肌梗死登记处中ST段抬高型和非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的就诊特征及医院死亡率趋势
Am Heart J. 2008 Dec;156(6):1026-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.07.030. Epub 2008 Nov 1.
9
Influence of presenting electrocardiographic findings on the treatment and outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.呈现心电图结果对非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者治疗和结局的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Jan 15;113(2):256-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.09.009. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
10
Impact of patients' arrival time on the care and in-hospital mortality in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.患者到达时间对非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的治疗和住院死亡率的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Jan 15;113(2):262-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.09.013. Epub 2013 Oct 4.

引用本文的文献

1
The Relevance of Interventional Time and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with NSTEMI Based on the GRACE Score.基于GRACE评分的非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者介入治疗时间与临床结局的相关性
Appl Bionics Biomech. 2022 Apr 29;2022:7614619. doi: 10.1155/2022/7614619. eCollection 2022.
2
Comparing clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes undergoing coronary artery bypass graft and percutaneous coronary intervention in real world practice in Iranian population.在伊朗人群的现实临床实践中,比较接受冠状动脉搭桥术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的糖尿病患者的临床结局。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Mar 3;22(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02521-z.
3
National Interhospital Transfer for Patients With Acute Cardiovascular Conditions.
急性心血管疾病患者的全国性医院间转运
CJC Open. 2020 Jul 9;2(6):539-546. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2020.07.003. eCollection 2020 Nov.