Ghosh Ishita, Mittal Srabani, Banerjee Dipanwita, Singh Priyanka, Dasgupta Sujoy, Chatterjee Simi, Biswas Jaydip, Panda Chinmay, Basu Partha
Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute, Kolkata, India.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014 Dec;54(6):570-5. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12282.
This population-based study was conducted to evaluate the performance of colposcopy to assess women with positive visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and/or human papillomavirus (HPV) tests.
A total of 30,773 women were screened by VIA and oncogenic HPV test. Hybrid capture 2 was used for oncogenic HPV detection. All VIA- and/or HPV-positive women and 8.7% test-negative women had the colposcopy. International Federation of Cervical Pathology & Colposcopy (IFCPC) 2011 nomenclature was used for colposcopic classification of abnormalities. All women with grade 1 or worse lesions had punch biopsies. Biopsies were also obtained from HPV-positive women with normal colposcopy.
Colposcopy and satisfactory biopsy reports were available for total 2466 women. The overall strength of agreement between colposcopy and histologic classification of cervical neoplasias was poor (kappa = 0.17). Agreement was better when colposcopy was performed on HPV-positive women compared to VIA-positive women. Sensitivity of colposcopy to detect high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) at referral threshold of grade 1 abnormality was 84.8% after correction of verification bias. Colposcopy was most inaccurate in identifying non-neoplastic conditions often encountered in VIA- and/or HPV-positive women. In 68.8% women with normal histology, colposcopic impression was grade 1 and above. Overestimation of disease severity on colposcopy was more common in VIA-positive women. Colposcopy also underestimated severity of disease in 52.6% of women with HSIL diagnosis on biopsy.
Colposcopy performed well in the overall detection of cervical neoplasias, though its capability for accurate categorisation of degree of abnormality was poor.
开展这项基于人群的研究,以评估阴道镜检查对醋酸肉眼观察(VIA)阳性和/或人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测阳性女性的评估效果。
共有30773名女性接受了VIA和致癌性HPV检测。采用杂交捕获2法检测致癌性HPV。所有VIA和/或HPV检测阳性的女性以及8.7%检测阴性的女性接受了阴道镜检查。采用国际宫颈病理与阴道镜检查联合会(IFCPC)2011年命名法对异常情况进行阴道镜分类。所有1级或更严重病变的女性均接受了活检。HPV检测阳性但阴道镜检查正常的女性也进行了活检。
共有2466名女性获得了阴道镜检查及满意的活检报告。阴道镜检查与宫颈肿瘤组织学分类之间的总体一致性较差(kappa = 0.17)。与VIA检测阳性的女性相比,对HPV检测阳性的女性进行阴道镜检查时一致性更好。在校正验证偏倚后,阴道镜检查在1级异常转诊阈值下检测高级别鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)的敏感性为84.8%。阴道镜检查在识别VIA和/或HPV检测阳性女性中常见的非肿瘤性情况时最不准确。在组织学正常的女性中,68.8%的阴道镜检查印象为1级及以上。阴道镜检查对疾病严重程度的高估在VIA检测阳性的女性中更为常见。在活检诊断为HSIL的女性中,52.6%的阴道镜检查也低估了疾病的严重程度。
阴道镜检查在宫颈肿瘤的总体检测中表现良好,但其对异常程度进行准确分类的能力较差。