Griffith Niesha, McBride Ali, Stevenson James G, Green Larry
Department of Pharmacy, The Ohio State Comprehensive Cancer Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute , Columbus, Ohio.
The University of Arizona Cancer Center, The University of Arizona , Tucson, Arizona.
Hosp Pharm. 2014 Oct;49(9):813-25. doi: 10.1310/hpj4909-813.
Pharmacists will play a key role in evaluating biosimilars for formulary inclusion in the United States. As defined by US law, a biosimilar is a biologic that is highly similar to its reference product, notwithstanding minor differences in clinically inactive components, and should not have clinically meaningful differences from its reference product in safety, purity, and potency. We review biosimilars and the current European Union and US regulatory pathways for biosimilars. Furthermore, we propose a checklist of considerations to ensure that US pharmacists thoroughly evaluate future biosimilars for formulary inclusion. Included in the checklist are considerations related to the availability of preapproval and postapproval safety and efficacy data; differences in product characteristics and immunogenicity between the biosimilar and reference product; manufacturer-related parameters that can affect a reliable supply of quality products; health-system and patient perspectives on product packaging, labeling, storage, and administration; costs and insurance coverage; patient education; interchangeability and differences in the range of indications; and evaluation of institutions' information technology systems.
药剂师在美国评估生物类似药是否纳入药品目录方面将发挥关键作用。根据美国法律定义,生物类似药是一种与其参照产品高度相似的生物制品,尽管其临床无活性成分存在细微差异,并且在安全性、纯度和效力方面与参照产品不应有临床意义上的差异。我们回顾了生物类似药以及欧盟和美国目前针对生物类似药的监管途径。此外,我们提出了一份考量清单,以确保美国药剂师全面评估未来生物类似药是否纳入药品目录。该清单包括与批准前和批准后安全性及有效性数据的可得性相关的考量;生物类似药与参照产品在产品特性和免疫原性方面的差异;可能影响优质产品可靠供应的制造商相关参数;卫生系统和患者对产品包装、标签、储存和给药的看法;成本和保险覆盖范围;患者教育;可互换性以及适应症范围的差异;以及对机构信息技术系统的评估。