Smit Marrit, Chan Kar-Li L, Middeldorp Johanna M, van Roosmalen Jos
Department of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Centre, K6-35, PO Box 9600, Leiden, 2300 RC, the Netherlands.
EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research Department of Medical Humanities, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Dec 7;14:397. doi: 10.1186/s12884-014-0397-8.
Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is still one of the major causes of severe maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Currently, no guideline for PPH occurring in primary midwifery care in the Netherlands is available. A set of 25 quality indicators for prevention and management of PPH in primary care has been developed by an expert panel consisting of midwives, obstetricians, ambulance personal and representatives of the Royal Dutch College of Midwives (KNOV) and the Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NVOG). This study aims to assess the performance of these quality indicators as an assessment tool for midwifery care and suitability for incorporation in a professional midwifery guideline.
From April 2008 to April 2010, midwives reported cases of PPH. Cases were assessed using the 25 earlier developed quality indicators. Quality criteria on applicability, feasibility, adherence to the indicator, and the indicator's potential to monitor improvement were assessed.
98 cases of PPH were reported during the study period, of which 94 were analysed. Eleven indicators were found to be applicable and feasible. Five of these indicators showed improvement potential: routine administration of uterotonics, quantifying blood loss by weighing, timely referral to secondary care in homebirth and treatment of PPH using catherisation, uterine massage and oxytocin and the use of oxygen.
Eleven out of 25 indicators were found to be suitable as an assessment tool for midwifery care of PPH and are therefore suitable for incorporation in a professional midwifery guideline. Larger studies are necessary to confirm these results.
产后出血(PPH)仍是全球孕产妇严重发病和死亡的主要原因之一。目前,荷兰尚无关于初级助产护理中产后出血的指南。一个由助产士、产科医生、救护人员以及荷兰皇家助产士学院(KNOV)和荷兰妇产科学会(NVOG)代表组成的专家小组制定了一套25项初级护理中产后出血预防和管理的质量指标。本研究旨在评估这些质量指标作为助产护理评估工具的性能以及纳入专业助产指南的适用性。
2008年4月至2010年4月,助产士报告产后出血病例。使用之前制定的25项质量指标对病例进行评估。评估了指标在适用性、可行性、对指标的依从性以及监测改善情况的潜力方面的质量标准。
研究期间报告了98例产后出血病例,其中94例进行了分析。发现11项指标适用且可行。其中5项指标显示出改善潜力:宫缩剂的常规使用、通过称重量化失血量、在家分娩时及时转诊至二级护理以及使用导尿、子宫按摩和催产素治疗产后出血以及使用氧气。
25项指标中有11项被认为适合作为产后出血助产护理的评估工具,因此适合纳入专业助产指南。需要更大规模的研究来证实这些结果。