Suppr超能文献

奥拉帕利联合化疗治疗复发性铂类敏感卵巢癌:一项随机 2 期临床试验。

Olaparib combined with chemotherapy for recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: a randomised phase 2 trial.

机构信息

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.

General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Lancet Oncol. 2015 Jan;16(1):87-97. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71135-0. Epub 2014 Dec 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib has shown antitumour activity in patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent, high-grade serous ovarian cancer with or without BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of olaparib in combination with chemotherapy, followed by olaparib maintenance monotherapy, versus chemotherapy alone in patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent, high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

METHODS

In this randomised, open-label, phase 2 study, adult patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent, high-grade serous ovarian cancer who had received up to three previous courses of platinum-based chemotherapy and who were progression free for at least 6 months before randomisation received either olaparib (200 mg capsules twice daily, administered orally on days 1-10 of each 21-day cycle) plus paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2), administered intravenously on day 1) and carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] 4 mg/mL per min, according to the Calvert formula, administered intravenously on day 1), then olaparib monotherapy (400 mg capsules twice daily, given continuously) until progression (the olaparib plus chemotherapy group), or paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) on day 1) and carboplatin (AUC 6 mg/mL per min on day 1) then no further treatment (the chemotherapy alone group). Randomisation was done by an interactive voice response system, stratified by number of previous platinum-containing regimens received and time to disease progression after the previous platinum regimen. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, analysed by intention to treat. Prespecified exploratory analyses included efficacy by BRCA mutation status, assessed retrospectively. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01081951, and has been completed.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 12 and July 30, 2010, 173 patients at 43 investigational sites in 12 countries were enrolled into the study, of whom 162 were eligible and were randomly assigned to the two treatment groups (81 to the olaparib plus chemotherapy group and 81 to the chemotherapy alone group). Of these randomised patients, 156 were treated in the combination phase (81 in the olaparib plus chemotherapy group and 75 in the chemotherapy alone group) and 121 continued to the maintenance or no further treatment phase (66 in the olaparib plus chemotherapy group and 55 in the chemotherapy alone group). BRCA mutation status was known for 107 patients (either at baseline or determined retrospectively): 41 (38%) of 107 had a BRCA mutation (20 in the olaparib plus chemotherapy group and 21 in the chemotherapy alone group). Progression-free survival was significantly longer in the olaparib plus chemotherapy group (median 12.2 months [95% CI 9.7-15.0]) than in the chemotherapy alone group (median 9.6 months [95% CI 9.1-9.7) (HR 0.51 [95% CI 0.34-0.77]; p=0.0012), especially in patients with BRCA mutations (HR 0.21 [0.08-0.55]; p=0.0015). In the combination phase, adverse events that were reported at least 10% more frequently with olaparib plus chemotherapy than with chemotherapy alone were alopecia (60 [74%] of 81 vs 44 [59%] of 75), nausea (56 [69%] vs 43 [57%]), neutropenia (40 [49%] vs 29 [39%]), diarrhoea (34 [42%] vs 20 [27%]), headache (27 [33%] vs seven [9%]), peripheral neuropathy (25 [31%] vs 14 [19%]), and dyspepsia (21 [26%] vs 9 [12%]); most were of mild-to-moderate intensity. The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events during the combination phase were neutropenia (in 35 [43%] of 81 patients in the olaparib plus chemotherapy group vs 26 [35%] of 75 in the chemotherapy alone group) and anaemia (seven [9%] vs five [7%]). Serious adverse events were reported in 12 (15%) of 81 patients in the olaparib plus chemotherapy group and 16 of 75 (21%) patients in the chemotherapy alone group.

INTERPRETATION

Olaparib plus paclitaxel and carboplatin followed by maintenance monotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival versus paclitaxel plus carboplatin alone, with the greatest clinical benefit in BRCA-mutated patients, and had an acceptable and manageable tolerability profile.

FUNDING

AstraZeneca.

摘要

背景

聚(ADP-核糖)聚合酶抑制剂奥拉帕尼在铂类敏感、复发性、高级别浆液性卵巢癌患者中具有抗肿瘤活性,无论 BRCA1 或 BRCA2 突变情况如何。本研究的目的是评估奥拉帕尼联合化疗后序贯奥拉帕尼维持单药治疗与单纯化疗在铂类敏感、复发性、高级别浆液性卵巢癌患者中的疗效和耐受性。

方法

在这项随机、开放标签、Ⅱ期研究中,接受过最多 3 次铂类化疗且在随机分组前至少 6 个月无疾病进展的铂类敏感、复发性、高级别浆液性卵巢癌成年患者,按铂类化疗方案数量和前次铂类化疗方案后疾病进展时间进行分层,接受奥拉帕尼(200mg 胶囊,每日 2 次,在每 21 天周期的第 1-10 天口服)联合紫杉醇(175mg/m2,静脉输注第 1 天)和卡铂(AUC 4mg/mL·min,根据 Calvert 公式,静脉输注第 1 天),然后接受奥拉帕尼单药治疗(400mg 胶囊,每日 2 次,连续服用)直至进展(奥拉帕尼联合化疗组),或接受紫杉醇(175mg/m2,第 1 天)和卡铂(AUC 6mg/mL·min,第 1 天),然后不再治疗(单纯化疗组)。随机分组通过交互式语音应答系统进行,按铂类化疗方案数量和前次铂类化疗方案后疾病进展时间进行分层。主要终点为根据实体瘤疗效评价标准 1.1 评估的无进展生存期,分析方法为意向治疗。预先设定的探索性分析包括按 BRCA 突变状态评估的疗效,该分析为回顾性分析。本研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT01081951,现已完成。

结果

2010 年 2 月 12 日至 7 月 30 日,在 12 个国家的 43 个研究地点,共纳入了 173 例患者,其中 162 例符合入组条件并随机分配到两组治疗(81 例分配到奥拉帕尼联合化疗组,81 例分配到单纯化疗组)。在这些随机分组的患者中,156 例患者接受了联合治疗(81 例分配到奥拉帕尼联合化疗组,75 例分配到单纯化疗组),121 例患者继续接受维持或不再治疗(66 例分配到奥拉帕尼联合化疗组,55 例分配到单纯化疗组)。107 例患者(或基线时或通过回顾性分析确定)的 BRCA 突变状态已知:20 例(奥拉帕尼联合化疗组 10 例,单纯化疗组 10 例)为 BRCA 突变。奥拉帕尼联合化疗组的无进展生存期显著长于单纯化疗组(中位无进展生存期 12.2 个月[95%CI9.7-15.0] vs 9.6 个月[95%CI9.1-9.7])(HR0.51[95%CI0.34-0.77];p=0.0012),尤其是在 BRCA 突变患者中(HR0.21[0.08-0.55];p=0.0015)。在联合治疗阶段,与单纯化疗组相比,奥拉帕尼联合化疗组更常报告的不良反应为脱发(60[74%]例比 44[59%]例)、恶心(56[69%]例比 43[57%]例)、中性粒细胞减少症(40[49%]例比 29[39%]例)、腹泻(34[42%]例比 20[27%]例)、头痛(27[33%]例比 7[9%]例)、周围神经病变(25[31%]例比 14[19%]例)和消化不良(21[26%]例比 9[12%]例);大多数不良反应为轻至中度。联合治疗阶段最常见的 3 级或 3 级以上不良事件是中性粒细胞减少症(奥拉帕尼联合化疗组 81 例患者中有 35 例[43%],单纯化疗组 75 例患者中有 26 例[35%])和贫血(奥拉帕尼联合化疗组 81 例患者中有 7 例[9%],单纯化疗组 75 例患者中有 5 例[7%])。奥拉帕尼联合化疗组 12 例(15%)和单纯化疗组 16 例(21%)患者报告了严重不良事件。

结论

奥拉帕尼联合紫杉醇和卡铂序贯奥拉帕尼维持单药治疗显著改善了无进展生存期,与单纯紫杉醇和卡铂化疗相比,无进展生存期获益最大,且在 BRCA 突变患者中获益最大,同时具有可接受的和可管理的耐受性特征。

资金来源

阿斯利康。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验