Allen Gomes Ana, Ruivo Marques Daniel, Meia-Via Ana Maria, Meia-Via Mariana, Tavares José, Fernandes da Silva Carlos, Pinto de Azevedo Maria Helena
Department of Education, University of Aveiro , Aveiro , Portugal .
Chronobiol Int. 2015 Apr;32(3):428-40. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2014.986681. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
Based on successive samples totaling more than 5000 higher education students, we scrutinized the reliability, structure, initial validity and normative scores of a brief self-report seven-item scale to screen for the continuum of nighttime insomnia complaints/perceived sleep quality, used by our team for more than a decade, henceforth labeled the Basic Scale on Insomnia complaints and Quality of Sleep (BaSIQS). In study/sample 1 (n = 1654), the items were developed based on part of a larger survey on higher education sleep-wake patterns. The test-retest study was conducted in an independent small group (n = 33) with a 2-8 week gap. In study/sample 2 (n = 360), focused mainly on validity, the BaSIQS was completed together with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). In study 3, a large recent sample of students from universities all over the country (n = 2995) answered the BaSIQS items, based on which normative scores were determined, and an additional question on perceived sleep problems in order to further analyze the scale's validity. Regarding reliability, Cronbach alpha coefficients were systematically higher than 0.7, and the test-retest correlation coefficient was greater than 0.8. Structure analyses revealed consistently satisfactory two-factor and single-factor solutions. Concerning validity analyses, BaSIQS scores were significantly correlated with PSQI component scores and overall score (r = 0.652 corresponding to a large association); mean scores were significantly higher in those students classifying themselves as having sleep problems (p < 0.0001, d = 0.99 corresponding to a large effect size). In conclusion, the BaSIQS is very easy to administer, and appears to be a reliable and valid scale in higher education students. It might be a convenient short tool in research and applied settings to rapidly assess sleep quality or screen for insomnia complaints, and it may be easily used in other populations with minor adaptations.
基于总计超过5000名高等教育学生的连续样本,我们仔细审查了一个简短的自我报告七项量表的信度、结构、初始效度和常模分数,该量表用于筛查夜间失眠主诉/感知睡眠质量的连续情况,我们团队已使用了十多年,此后将其标记为失眠主诉与睡眠质量基本量表(BaSIQS)。在研究/样本1(n = 1654)中,这些项目是基于一项关于高等教育睡眠-觉醒模式的更大规模调查的一部分开发的。重测研究在一个独立的小群体(n = 33)中进行,间隔时间为2至8周。在研究/样本2(n = 360)中,主要关注效度,BaSIQS与匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)一起完成。在研究3中,最近从全国各大学抽取的一大群学生样本(n = 2995)回答了BaSIQS项目,据此确定了常模分数,并增加了一个关于感知睡眠问题的问题,以便进一步分析该量表的效度。关于信度,克朗巴哈α系数系统地高于0.7,重测相关系数大于0.8。结构分析始终显示出令人满意的两因素和单因素解决方案。关于效度分析,BaSIQS分数与PSQI各成分分数和总分显著相关(r = 0.652,对应于强关联);自我归类为有睡眠问题的学生的平均分数显著更高(p < 0.0001,d = 0.99,对应于大效应量)。总之,BaSIQS非常易于实施,在高等教育学生中似乎是一个可靠且有效的量表。它可能是研究和应用环境中快速评估睡眠质量或筛查失眠主诉的便捷简短工具,并且稍作调整后可能很容易用于其他人群。