Exeter Daniel J, Sabel Clive E, Hanham Grant, Lee Arier C, Wells Susan
School of Population Health, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.
School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, England, United Kingdom.
Soc Sci Med. 2015 May;133:331-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.11.056. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
The association between area-level disadvantage and health and social outcomes is unequivocal. However, less is known about the health impact of residential mobility, particularly at intra-urban scales. We used an encrypted National Health Index (eNHI) number to link individual-level data recorded in routine national health databases to construct a cohort of 641,532 participants aged 30+ years to investigate the association between moving and CVD hospitalisations in Auckland, New Zealand. Residential mobility was measured for participants according to changes in the census Meshblock of usual residence, obtained from the Primary Health Organisation (PHO) database for every calendar quarter between 1/1/2006 and 31/12/2012. The NZDep2006 area deprivation score at the start and end of a participant's inclusion in the study was used to measure deprivation mobility. We investigated the relative risk of movers being hospitalised for CVD relative to stayers using multi-variable binomial regression models, controlling for age, gender, deprivation and ethnicity. Considered together, movers were 1.22 (1.19-1.26) times more likely than stayers to be hospitalised for CVD. Using the 5×5 deprivation origin-destination matrix to model a patient's risk of CVD based on upward, downward or sideways deprivation mobility, movers within the least deprived (NZDep2006 Quintile 1) areas were 10% less likely than stayers to be hospitalised for CVD, while movers within the most deprived (NZDep2006 Q5) areas were 45% more likely than stayers to have had their first CVD hospitalisation in 2006-2012 (RR: 1.45 [1.35-1.55]). Participants who moved upward also had higher relative risks of having a CVD event, although their risk was less than those observed for participants experiencing downward deprivation mobility. This research suggests that residential mobility is an important determinant of CVD in Auckland. Further investigation is required to determine the impact moving has on the risk of CVD by ethnicity.
地区层面的劣势与健康及社会结果之间的关联是明确无疑的。然而,关于居住流动性对健康的影响,人们了解得较少,尤其是在城市内部层面。我们使用加密的国民健康指数(eNHI)编号,将常规国家健康数据库中记录的个人层面数据相链接,构建了一个由641,532名30岁及以上参与者组成的队列,以调查新西兰奥克兰市搬家与心血管疾病(CVD)住院之间的关联。根据从初级卫生组织(PHO)数据库获取的2006年1月1日至2012年12月31日期间每个日历季度常住普查网格街区的变化,对参与者的居住流动性进行测量。参与者纳入研究开始和结束时的2006年新西兰地区贫困得分用于衡量贫困流动性。我们使用多变量二项式回归模型,在控制年龄、性别、贫困和种族的情况下,研究搬家者相对于未搬家者因CVD住院的相对风险。综合考虑,搬家者因CVD住院的可能性是未搬家者的1.22(1.19 - 1.26)倍。使用5×5贫困源 - 目的地矩阵,根据向上、向下或横向贫困流动性来模拟患者患CVD的风险,在最不贫困(2006年新西兰贫困五分位数第1组)地区内的搬家者因CVD住院的可能性比未搬家者低10%,而在最贫困(2006年新西兰贫困五分位数第5组)地区内的搬家者在2006 - 2012年首次因CVD住院的可能性比未搬家者高45%(相对风险:1.45 [1.35 - 1.55])。向上搬家的参与者发生CVD事件的相对风险也较高,尽管其风险低于经历向下贫困流动性的参与者。这项研究表明,居住流动性是奥克兰市CVD的一个重要决定因素。需要进一步调查以确定搬家对不同种族CVD风险的影响。