Gasco Valentina, Berton Alessandro, Caprino Mirko Parasiliti, Karamouzis Ioannis, Maccario Mauro, Ghigo Ezio, Grottoli Silvia
Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medical Science, University of Turin, Città della Salute e della Scienza - Osp. San Giovanni Battista, C.so Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Endocrine. 2015 Nov;50(2):474-82. doi: 10.1007/s12020-014-0494-5. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
The insulin tolerance test (ITT) is the gold standard to evaluate adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) insufficiency. However, alternative tests have been proposed such as metyrapone, glucagon, and ACTH stimulation test. We determined the diagnostic reliability of testing with ghrelin, the natural GH secretagogue that is a potent stimulus exploring the integrity of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. We studied the ACTH and cortisol response to acylated ghrelin in 49 patients with history of pituitary disease. The best cortisol and ACTH cut offs to ghrelin test, defined as those with the best sensitivity (SE) and specificity (SP), were identified using the ROC analysis. We also compared accuracy of ghrelin test with that of a simple and cheap test like basal cortisol and ACTH levels. The best cortisol and ACTH cut offs to ghrelin test were ≤11.6 µg/dl (SE 86.4%, SP 77.8%) and ≤32.5 pg/ml (SE 72.7%, SP 51.9%), respectively; the best basal cortisol and ACTH cut offs were ≤10.7 µg/dl (SE 90.9%, SP 70.4%) and ≤25.0 pg/ml (SE 85%, SP 37%), respectively. The diagnostic accuracy was 81.6, 60.9, 79.6, and 57.4%, respectively. A comparison between ROC AUC showed a great diagnostic power for cortisol, both stimulated and basal, versus ACTH, both stimulated and basal, but no difference between stimulated and basal cortisol evaluation. Our data show that testing with acylated ghrelin is not a useful diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of central hypocortisolism; particularly ghrelin test adds no more information that basal cortisol evaluation in the diagnosis of ACTH deficiency in patients with hypothalamus-pituitary disease.
胰岛素耐量试验(ITT)是评估促肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH)不足的金标准。然而,也有人提出了替代试验,如甲吡酮试验、胰高血糖素试验和ACTH刺激试验。我们确定了使用胃饥饿素进行检测的诊断可靠性,胃饥饿素是一种天然的生长激素促分泌素,是探索下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴完整性的有效刺激物。我们研究了49例有垂体疾病病史患者对酰化胃饥饿素的ACTH和皮质醇反应。使用ROC分析确定了胃饥饿素试验的最佳皮质醇和ACTH临界值,即具有最佳敏感性(SE)和特异性(SP)的临界值。我们还将胃饥饿素试验的准确性与基础皮质醇和ACTH水平等简单廉价试验的准确性进行了比较。胃饥饿素试验的最佳皮质醇和ACTH临界值分别为≤11.6µg/dl(SE 86.4%,SP 77.8%)和≤32.5 pg/ml(SE 72.7%,SP 51.9%);最佳基础皮质醇和ACTH临界值分别为≤10.7µg/dl(SE 90.9%,SP 70.4%)和≤25.0 pg/ml(SE 85%,SP 37%)。诊断准确性分别为81.6%、60.9%、79.6%和57.4%。ROC曲线下面积(AUC)的比较显示,无论是刺激后的还是基础的皮质醇,其诊断能力均优于刺激后的和基础的ACTH,但刺激后的和基础的皮质醇评估之间没有差异。我们的数据表明,酰化胃饥饿素检测对于中枢性皮质醇增多症的诊断不是一个有用的诊断工具;特别是在诊断下丘脑-垂体疾病患者的ACTH缺乏时,胃饥饿素试验并没有提供比基础皮质醇评估更多的信息。