Suppr超能文献

多西他赛仿制药的新皮肤毒性:辅料是罪魁祸首吗?

New cutaneous toxicities with generic docetaxel: are the excipients guilty?

作者信息

Garrido-Siles Margarita, Arenas-Villafranca Jose Javier, Pérez-Ruiz Elísabeth, de Linares Fernández M Francisca, Tortajada Begoña, Rivas-Ruiz Francisco, Faus Vicente, Rueda Antonio

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Hospital Costa del Sol, Marbella, Spain.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2015 Jul;23(7):1917-23. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2499-2. Epub 2014 Dec 10.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Docetaxel is one of the most widely used anticancer drugs and an ideal candidate for the development of generic formulations to reduce the economic cost. However, the use of generic drugs is an issue of debate because studies of their safety and efficacy in comparison with the original drug are not required for approval. The aim of this study is to determine whether the change in the formulation of the original drug is responsible for the toxicity changes observed.

METHODS

A retrospective study contrasts the incidence of acute infusion reactions and skin reactions to four different presentations of docetaxel including the original drug. These drugs differ in the amounts of excipients.

RESULTS

1.031 doses of docetaxel were administered to 268 patients. A total of 26 grade 3/4 infusion reactions were detected. Compared to the original formulation, the relative risk of acute infusion reaction was 3.74 (1.52-9.18, p = 0.002), 0.57 (0.19-1.64, p = 0.288) and 0.37 (0.1-1.34, p = 0.117) for the patients treated with drugs 2, 3 and 4. For the dermal toxicity, 9 % of patients suffered a clinically significant skin reaction. The relative risks of clinically significant dermal toxicity for the different formulations of docetaxel versus the original formulation were as follows: 6.15 (2.78-13.58) and 7.13 (3.24-15.69) for drugs 3 and 4 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that some toxic effects of docetaxel may be related to the excipients used in different formulations of the drug.

摘要

目的

多西他赛是应用最广泛的抗癌药物之一,也是开发降低经济成本的仿制药的理想选择。然而,仿制药的使用存在争议,因为其安全性和有效性与原研药对比的研究并非获批所需。本研究的目的是确定原研药剂型的改变是否是观察到的毒性变化的原因。

方法

一项回顾性研究对比了包括原研药在内的四种不同剂型多西他赛的急性输注反应和皮肤反应发生率。这些药物的辅料用量不同。

结果

268例患者共接受了1031剂多西他赛治疗。共检测到26例3/4级输注反应。与原研剂型相比,接受药物2、3和4治疗的患者发生急性输注反应的相对风险分别为3.74(1.52 - 9.18,p = 0.002)、0.57(0.19 - 1.64,p = 0.288)和0.37(0.1 - 1.34,p = 0.117)。对于皮肤毒性,9%的患者出现了具有临床意义的皮肤反应。不同剂型多西他赛相对于原研剂型具有临床意义的皮肤毒性的相对风险如下:药物3和4分别为6.15(2.78 - 13.58)和7.13(3.24 - 15.69)(p < 0.001)。

结论

我们的研究表明,多西他赛的一些毒性作用可能与该药物不同剂型中使用的辅料有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验