Sabesan Vani J, Ackerman Jeffrey, Sharma Vinay, Baker Kevin C, Kurdziel Michael D, Wiater J Michael
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Western Michigan University School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, MI, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 May;24(5):814-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.10.004. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
The "rocking horse" phenomenon is considered the main cause of glenoid component loosening by eccentric loading of the glenoid rim. This study aimed to investigate the influence of increasing glenohumeral implant mismatch on bone-implant interface micromotion in a cemented all-polyethylene pegged glenoid biomechanical model.
Five glenoid sizes, 40 mm, 44 mm, 48 mm, 52 mm, and 56 mm, representing +2 mm, +6 mm, +10 mm, +14 mm, and +18 mm glenohumeral mismatch, respectively, were cyclically loaded according to ASTM Standard F2028-08 at a constant frequency of 2 Hz to a size-dependent humeral head subluxation translation. Additional glenoid components were cyclically loaded to their subluxation translations at a constant humeral head rate of 4.4 mm/s. Component micromotion was characterized as compression, distraction, and superior-inferior translation measured by differential variable reluctance transducers.
During constant frequency tests, 52-mm and 56-mm glenoids were unable to complete cyclic testing because of catastrophic failure of the glenoid-implant interface and permanent glenoid deformation, probably due to increasing severity of testing parameters. When tested at a constant humeral head speed, 48-mm, 52-mm, and 56-mm glenoids had significantly increased glenoid distraction and glenoid translation at cycle 50,000 compared with cycle 1. Distraction and translation measurements for 52-mm and 56-mm glenoids were significantly greater compared with 40-mm, 44-mm, and 48-mm glenoids at 50,000 cycles.
In a biomechanical model, optimal glenohumeral mismatch in cemented pegged glenoid implants is multifactorial and has not been definitively established. However, our data suggest that a radial mismatch of less than +10 mm may decrease the risk of glenoid micromotion.
“摇马”现象被认为是由于肩胛盂边缘的偏心负荷导致肩胛盂组件松动的主要原因。本研究旨在探讨在骨水泥固定的全聚乙烯带柄肩胛盂生物力学模型中,增加肱盂植入物不匹配对骨-植入物界面微动的影响。
根据美国材料与试验协会(ASTM)标准F2028-08,以2 Hz的恒定频率对代表+2 mm、+6 mm、+10 mm、+14 mm和+18 mm肱盂不匹配的五种肩胛盂尺寸(40 mm、44 mm、48 mm、52 mm和56 mm)进行循环加载,直至达到与尺寸相关的肱骨头半脱位平移。以4.4 mm/s的恒定肱骨头速度对额外的肩胛盂组件进行循环加载,直至达到其半脱位平移。组件微动通过差动可变磁阻传感器测量,分为压缩、牵张和上下平移。
在恒定频率测试期间,52 mm和56 mm的肩胛盂由于肩胛盂-植入物界面的灾难性失效和肩胛盂的永久性变形而无法完成循环测试,这可能是由于测试参数的严重程度增加所致。当以恒定肱骨头速度进行测试时,与第1个循环相比,48 mm、52 mm和56 mm的肩胛盂在第50000个循环时肩胛盂牵张和肩胛盂平移显著增加。在第50000个循环时,52 mm和56 mm肩胛盂的牵张和平移测量值与40 mm、44 mm和48 mm肩胛盂相比显著更大。
在生物力学模型中,骨水泥固定带柄肩胛盂植入物的最佳肱盂不匹配是多因素的,尚未明确确定。然而,我们的数据表明,径向不匹配小于+10 mm可能会降低肩胛盂微动的风险。