Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 151-742, Republic of Korea.
Korea Environment Corporation, 42 Hwangyeong-ro, Seo-gu, Incheon 404-170, Republic of Korea.
Waste Manag. 2015 Feb;36:197-203. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.10.020. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
According to IPCC guidelines, a semi-aerobic landfill site produces one-half of the amount of CH4 produced by an equally-sized anaerobic landfill site. Therefore categorizing the landfill type is important on greenhouse gas inventories. In order to assess semi-aerobic condition in the sites and the MCF value for semi-aerobic landfill, landfill gas has been measured from vent pipes in five semi-aerobically designed landfills in South Korea. All of the five sites satisfied requirements of semi-aerobic landfills in 2006 IPCC guidelines. However, the ends of leachate collection pipes which are main entrance of air in the semi-aerobic landfill were closed in all five sites. The CH4/CO2 ratio in landfill gas, indicator of aerobic and anaerobic decomposition, ranged from 1.08 to 1.46 which is higher than the values (0.3-1.0) reported for semi-aerobic landfill sites and is rather close to those (1.0-2.0) for anaerobic landfill sites. The low CH4+CO2% in landfill gas implied air intrusion into the landfill. However, there was no evidence that air intrusion has caused by semi-aerobic design and operation. Therefore, the landfills investigated in this study are difficult to be classified as semi-aerobic landfills. Also MCF of 0.5 may significantly underestimate methane emissions compared to other researches. According to the carbon mass balance analyses, the higher MCF needs to be proposed for semi-aerobic landfills. Consequently, methane emission estimate should be based on field evaluation for the semi-aerobically designed landfills.
根据政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)的指南,半好氧垃圾填埋场产生的甲烷量仅为同等规模的厌氧垃圾填埋场的一半。因此,在温室气体清单中对垃圾填埋场类型进行分类非常重要。为了评估垃圾填埋场的半好氧条件和半好氧垃圾填埋场的 MCF 值,从韩国五个半好氧设计的垃圾填埋场的通风管中测量了垃圾填埋气体。所有五个场地均符合 2006 年 IPCC 指南对半好氧垃圾填埋场的要求。然而,在所有五个场地中,渗滤液收集管的末端(空气进入半好氧垃圾填埋场的主要入口)都被封闭。垃圾填埋气体中的 CH4/CO2 比值(有氧和无氧分解的指标)范围为 1.08 至 1.46,高于半好氧垃圾填埋场报告的(0.3-1.0)值,更接近厌氧垃圾填埋场报告的(1.0-2.0)值。垃圾填埋气体中低的 CH4+CO2% 意味着空气侵入了垃圾填埋场。然而,没有证据表明空气侵入是由半好氧设计和操作引起的。因此,本研究中调查的垃圾填埋场很难被归类为半好氧垃圾填埋场。此外,与其他研究相比,0.5 的 MCF 可能会大大低估甲烷排放量。根据碳质量平衡分析,需要为半好氧垃圾填埋场提出更高的 MCF。因此,对于半好氧设计的垃圾填埋场,应基于现场评估来估算甲烷排放量。