Saaiq Muhammad
Department of Plastic Surgery, Burn Care Center, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS), Islamabad, Pakistan.
World J Plast Surg. 2014 Jan;3(1):13-7.
Penetrating and impalement injuries of the hand and fingers are one of the commonest presentations at the hospital's emergency rooms. This study assessed the characteristics of patients who suffered foreign body injuries to the hands and documented the pattern of diagnosis and management at a specialist plastic surgical facility.
The study was conducted at the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS), Islamabad over a period of six years (i.e. from September 1, 2007 to July 31, 2013). All adult patients (37 subjects) of either gender who were managed for hand foreign bodies during the study period were included by convenience sampling technique. The demographic profile of the patients, cause of injury, type of foreign body, occupation of the patient, diagnostic yield of plain x-rays, type of procedure undertaken for retrieval of foreign body, and complications were all recorded on a form. A follow-up of three months was done.
Eighteen (48.64%) were males while 51.35% (n=19) were female. The mean age was 26.78±9.94 years. The commonest sufferers were housewives 29.72% (n=11). Majority of patients (n=16; 43.24%) presented on day 3 (i.e. >48-72 hours), among the injury causing mechanisms, the commonest were accidents with sewing machines 45.94% (n=17) and sewing machine needles 45.94% (n=17) were the commonest foreign bodies observed. The plain x-ray hands reveled the diagnosis in all patients except those with wooden foreign bodies (n=3; 8.10%). All patients had successful surgical exploration and retrieval of the foreign bodies under local anesthesia and tourniquet control. In two cases, image intensifier was employed to locate the foreign bodies per-operatively. Wound infection was found in 0.8% (n=4) patients, all of whom were managed successfully with oral antibiotics. None of patients had hospitalization. All patients were fine at 3 months follow up.
Surgical exploration and careful retrieval under local anesthesia and tourniquet control suffice as the definitive treatment. Rarely intra-operative image intensifier is needed to locate foreign bodies per-operatively.
手部和手指的穿透伤和穿刺伤是医院急诊室最常见的病症之一。本研究评估了手部遭受异物损伤患者的特征,并记录了一家专业整形外科机构的诊断和处理模式。
该研究在伊斯兰堡巴基斯坦医学科学研究所(PIMS)整形与重建外科进行,为期六年(即从2007年9月1日至2013年7月31日)。采用便利抽样技术纳入了研究期间所有因手部异物接受治疗的成年患者(37名受试者)。将患者的人口统计学资料、受伤原因、异物类型、患者职业、X线平片的诊断阳性率、取出异物所采用的手术方式以及并发症等全部记录在一张表格上。进行了为期三个月的随访。
18名(48.64%)为男性,19名(51.35%)为女性。平均年龄为26.78±9.94岁。最常见的受害者是家庭主妇,占29.72%(n = 11)。大多数患者(n = 16;43.24%)在第3天就诊(即>48 - 72小时),在致伤机制中,最常见的是缝纫机事故,占45.94%(n = 17),观察到的最常见异物是缝纫机针,占45.94%(n = 17)。手部X线平片除了对3名(8.10%)有木质异物的患者外,对所有患者都做出了诊断。所有患者在局部麻醉和止血带控制下成功进行了手术探查并取出异物。有2例患者术中使用影像增强器定位异物。0.8%(n = 4)的患者出现伤口感染,所有这些患者经口服抗生素治疗均成功治愈。所有患者均未住院。所有患者在3个月随访时情况良好。
在局部麻醉和止血带控制下进行手术探查并仔细取出异物足以作为确定性治疗。术中很少需要使用影像增强器来定位异物。