Frank R R, Trois C, Coulon F
a Centre for Research in Environmental, Coastal and Hydrological Engineering (CRECHE), School of Engineering , University of KwaZulu-Natal , Howard College Campus, Durban 4041 , South Africa.
Environ Technol. 2015 May-Jun;36(9-12):1347-58. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2014.989279. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
Raw and 10-week composted commercial garden refuse (CGR) materials and pine bark (PB) mulch were evaluated for their potential use as alternative and sustainable sources of carbon for landfill leachate bio-denitrification. Dynamic batch tests using synthetic nitrate solutions of 100, 500 and 2000 mg NO3 L(-1) were used to investigate the substrate performance at increasing nitrate concentrations under optimal conditions. Further to this, sequential batch tests using genuine nitrified landfill leachate with a concentration of 2000 mg NO3 L(-1) were carried out to evaluate substrates behaviour in the presence of a complex mixture of chemicals present in leachate. Results showed that complete denitrification occurred in all conditions, indicating that raw and composted CGR and PB can be used as sustainable and efficient media for landfill leachate bio-denitrification. Of the three substrates, raw garden refuse yields the fastest denitrification rate followed by 10-week composted CGR and PB. However, the efficiency of the raw CGR was lower when using genuine leachate, indicating the inhibitory effect of components of the leachate on the denitrification process. Ten-week composted CGR performed optimally at low nitrate concentrations, while poor nitrate removal ability was found at higher nitrate concentrations (2000 mg L(-1)). In contrast, the PB performance was 3.5 times faster than that of the composted garden refuse at higher nitrate concentrations. Further to this, multi-criteria analysis of the process variables provided an easily implementable framework for the use of waste materials as an alternative and sustainable source of carbon for denitrification.
对未经处理和经过10周堆肥处理的商业园林垃圾(CGR)材料以及松树皮(PB)覆盖物进行了评估,以确定它们作为填埋渗滤液生物反硝化替代且可持续碳源的潜在用途。使用100、500和2000mg NO₃ L⁻¹的合成硝酸盐溶液进行动态批次试验,以研究在最佳条件下硝酸盐浓度增加时底物的性能。此外,还使用浓度为2000mg NO₃ L⁻¹的真实硝化填埋渗滤液进行了连续批次试验,以评估底物在渗滤液中存在的复杂化学混合物情况下的行为。结果表明,在所有条件下均发生了完全反硝化,这表明未经处理和经过堆肥处理的CGR以及PB可作为填埋渗滤液生物反硝化的可持续且高效的介质。在这三种底物中,未经处理的园林垃圾产生的反硝化速率最快,其次是经过10周堆肥处理的CGR和PB。然而,使用真实渗滤液时,未经处理的CGR的效率较低,这表明渗滤液成分对反硝化过程具有抑制作用。经过10周堆肥处理的CGR在低硝酸盐浓度下表现最佳,而在较高硝酸盐浓度(2000mg L⁻¹)下发现其硝酸盐去除能力较差。相比之下,在较高硝酸盐浓度下,PB的性能比堆肥园林垃圾快3.5倍。此外,对过程变量的多标准分析为使用废料作为反硝化的替代且可持续碳源提供了一个易于实施的框架。