Suppr超能文献

剪切熔化和浓度跃变后胶体玻璃的物理老化行为比较

Comparison of the physical aging behavior of a colloidal glass after shear melting and concentration jumps.

作者信息

Peng Xiaoguang, McKenna Gregory B

机构信息

Department of Chemical Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas 79409, USA.

出版信息

Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2014 Nov;90(5-1):050301. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.90.050301. Epub 2014 Nov 3.

Abstract

Colloidal systems are considered good models of molecular glasses and we further explore the range of validity of this paradigm using a thermosensitive core-shell particle dispersion to study the aging response of a colloidal glass subsequent to both shear-melting and temperature (concentration)-jump perturbations in the vicinity of the glass transition concentration or temperature. Sequential creep experiments were used to probe the different aging responses of the system. The colloidal glass displays aging behavior after both types of perturbation and our results indicate that this colloidal glass is similar to a molecular glass, in that shift rates are found to be below unity and to decrease towards zero as the glass temperature (or concentration) is approached as temperature increases. However, the kinetics of the aging in the two cases are different indicating that the structural changes induced by the mechanical perturbation are different from those induced by the temperature or concentration jump-similar to findings on mechanical rejuvenation of molecular glasses. We also find differences between the colloidal glass and molecular glasses: In the case of the colloidal glass the structural recovery or equilibration times do not diverge, while the mechanical relaxation times do. On the other hand, for the molecular glass, both times change very rapidly with decreasing temperature, apparently towards a distant point of divergence.

摘要

胶体体系被认为是分子玻璃的良好模型,我们进一步利用热敏核壳颗粒分散体系来研究胶体玻璃在玻璃化转变浓度或温度附近经受剪切熔化以及温度(浓度)跃变扰动后老化响应,以此探索该范例的有效性范围。采用连续蠕变实验来探究体系的不同老化响应。在这两种类型的扰动之后,胶体玻璃均呈现出老化行为,并且我们的结果表明,这种胶体玻璃类似于分子玻璃,因为发现转变速率低于1,并且随着温度升高接近玻璃温度(或浓度)时,转变速率会降至零。然而,这两种情况下老化的动力学是不同的,这表明机械扰动引起的结构变化与温度或浓度跃变引起的结构变化不同,这与分子玻璃机械恢复活力的研究结果相似。我们还发现了胶体玻璃与分子玻璃之间的差异:在胶体玻璃的情况下,结构恢复或平衡时间不会发散,而机械弛豫时间会发散。另一方面,对于分子玻璃,这两种时间都随着温度降低而迅速变化,显然趋向于一个遥远的发散点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验