Peters Joost, Bruijstens Loes, van der Ploeg Jeroen, Tan Edward, Hoogerwerf Nico, Edwards Michael
Department of Trauma Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Helicopter Emergency Medical Service, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Department of Anesthesiology, HEMS, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Injury. 2015 May;46(5):787-90. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.11.024. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
Airway management is essential in critically ill or injured patients. In a "can't intubate, can't oxygenate" scenario, an emergency surgical airway (ESA), similar to a cricothyroidotomy, is the final step in airway management. This procedure is infrequently performed in the prehospital or clinical setting. The incidence of ESA may differ between physician- and non-physician-staffed emergency medical services (EMS). We examined the indications and results of ESA procedures among our physician-staffed EMS compared with non-physician-staffed services.
Data for all forms of airway management were obtained from our EMS providers and analyzed and compared with data from non-physician-staffed EMS found in the literature.
Among 1871 patients requiring a secured airway, the incidence of a surgical airway was 1.6% (n=30). Fourteen patients received a primary ESA. In 16 patients, a secondary ESA was required after failed endotracheal intubation. The total prehospital ESA tracheal access success rate was 96.7%.
The incidence of ESA in our patient population was low compared with those reported in the literature from non-physician-staffed EMS. Advanced intubation skills might be a contributing factor, thus reducing the number of ESAs required.
气道管理对于重症或受伤患者至关重要。在“无法插管,无法给氧”的情况下,类似于环甲膜切开术的紧急手术气道(ESA)是气道管理的最后一步。该操作在院前或临床环境中很少进行。在由医生和非医生配备人员的紧急医疗服务(EMS)中,ESA的发生率可能有所不同。我们比较了我们由医生配备人员的EMS与非医生配备人员的服务中ESA操作的适应症和结果。
从我们的EMS提供者处获取所有气道管理形式的数据,并进行分析,并与文献中发现的非医生配备人员的EMS数据进行比较。
在1871名需要确保气道安全的患者中,手术气道的发生率为1.6%(n = 30)。14名患者接受了初次ESA。16名患者在气管插管失败后需要二次ESA。院前ESA气管穿刺成功率为967%。
与非医生配备人员的EMS文献报道相比,我们患者群体中ESA的发生率较低。先进的插管技术可能是一个促成因素,从而减少了所需的ESA数量。