Suppr超能文献

由配备医生的直升机紧急医疗服务执行的紧急手术气道的适应症和结果。

Indications and results of emergency surgical airways performed by a physician-staffed helicopter emergency service.

作者信息

Peters Joost, Bruijstens Loes, van der Ploeg Jeroen, Tan Edward, Hoogerwerf Nico, Edwards Michael

机构信息

Department of Trauma Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Helicopter Emergency Medical Service, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Department of Anesthesiology, HEMS, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Injury. 2015 May;46(5):787-90. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.11.024. Epub 2014 Nov 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Airway management is essential in critically ill or injured patients. In a "can't intubate, can't oxygenate" scenario, an emergency surgical airway (ESA), similar to a cricothyroidotomy, is the final step in airway management. This procedure is infrequently performed in the prehospital or clinical setting. The incidence of ESA may differ between physician- and non-physician-staffed emergency medical services (EMS). We examined the indications and results of ESA procedures among our physician-staffed EMS compared with non-physician-staffed services.

METHODS

Data for all forms of airway management were obtained from our EMS providers and analyzed and compared with data from non-physician-staffed EMS found in the literature.

RESULTS

Among 1871 patients requiring a secured airway, the incidence of a surgical airway was 1.6% (n=30). Fourteen patients received a primary ESA. In 16 patients, a secondary ESA was required after failed endotracheal intubation. The total prehospital ESA tracheal access success rate was 96.7%.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of ESA in our patient population was low compared with those reported in the literature from non-physician-staffed EMS. Advanced intubation skills might be a contributing factor, thus reducing the number of ESAs required.

摘要

背景

气道管理对于重症或受伤患者至关重要。在“无法插管,无法给氧”的情况下,类似于环甲膜切开术的紧急手术气道(ESA)是气道管理的最后一步。该操作在院前或临床环境中很少进行。在由医生和非医生配备人员的紧急医疗服务(EMS)中,ESA的发生率可能有所不同。我们比较了我们由医生配备人员的EMS与非医生配备人员的服务中ESA操作的适应症和结果。

方法

从我们的EMS提供者处获取所有气道管理形式的数据,并进行分析,并与文献中发现的非医生配备人员的EMS数据进行比较。

结果

在1871名需要确保气道安全的患者中,手术气道的发生率为1.6%(n = 30)。14名患者接受了初次ESA。16名患者在气管插管失败后需要二次ESA。院前ESA气管穿刺成功率为967%。

结论

与非医生配备人员的EMS文献报道相比,我们患者群体中ESA的发生率较低。先进的插管技术可能是一个促成因素,从而减少了所需的ESA数量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验