Suppr超能文献

米非司酮辅助用于扩张和清宫术前的宫颈准备:一项随机试验。

Adjunct mifepristone for cervical preparation prior to dilation and evacuation: a randomized trial.

作者信息

Shaw Kate A, Shaw Jonathan G, Hugin Michele, Velasquez Griselda, Hopkins Frederick W, Blumenthal Paul D

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

Division of General Medical Disciplines, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

出版信息

Contraception. 2015 Apr;91(4):313-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.11.014. Epub 2014 Dec 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to investigate mifepristone as a potential adjunct to cervical preparation for surgical abortion after 19 weeks of gestation, with the aim of improving procedure access, convenience and comfort.

METHODS

This is a site-stratified, block-randomized, noninferiority trial of 50 women undergoing surgical abortion between 19 and 23 6/7 weeks of gestation randomized to receive either one set of osmotic dilators plus mifepristone the day prior to procedure (mifepristone group) or two sets of osmotic dilators (placed 18-24 h apart) in the 2 days prior to procedure (control group). All subjects received preprocedure misoprostol. Primary outcome was procedure time. Secondary outcomes included preoperative cervical dilation, ease of procedure, and side effects and pain experienced by subjects.

RESULTS

Mean gestational age was similar between groups (20 weeks); more nulliparous subjects were randomized to the mifepristone group (46% vs. 12%, p=.009). Mean procedure times were similar: mifepristone group 11:52 (SD 5:29) vs. control group 10:56 (SD 5:08); difference in means -56s, with confidence interval (95% CI -4:09 to +2:16) not exceeding the 5-min difference we a priori defined as clinically significant. Preprocedure cervical dilation did not differ and was >3cm for the majority of subjects in both groups. There was no difference (p=.6) in ease of procedure reported by providers. Preoperative (postmisoprostol) pain and postoperative pain levels were greater with mifepristone (p = 0.02 and p= 0.04 respectively). Overall subject experience was not different (p=0.80), with most reporting a "better than expected" experience.

CONCLUSIONS

Mifepristone with one set of osmotic dilators and misoprostol did not result in longer procedure times or less cervical dilation than serial (two sets) of osmotic dilators and misoprostol, and has the potential to improve access to second trimester abortion without compromising safety.

IMPLICATIONS

Use of mifepristone for cervical preparation before surgical abortion after 19 weeks allows for fewer visits and fewer osmotic dilators without compromising cervical dilation or increasing procedure time.

摘要

目的

研究米非司酮作为妊娠19周后手术流产宫颈准备的潜在辅助药物,旨在改善手术操作的便利性、舒适性及可及性。

方法

这是一项按地点分层、区组随机、非劣效性试验,纳入50例妊娠19至23⁶/₇周行手术流产的女性,随机分为两组,一组在手术前一天接受一组渗透扩张器加米非司酮(米非司酮组),另一组在手术前2天接受两组渗透扩张器(间隔18 - 24小时放置)(对照组)。所有受试者术前均接受米索前列醇。主要结局指标为手术时间。次要结局指标包括术前宫颈扩张情况、手术难易程度以及受试者经历的副作用和疼痛。

结果

两组的平均孕周相似(20周);更多未生育受试者被随机分配至米非司酮组(46%对12%,p = 0.009)。平均手术时间相似:米非司酮组为11:52(标准差5:29),对照组为10:56(标准差5:08);平均差值为 - 56秒,95%置信区间(CI)为 - 4:09至 + 2:16,未超过我们预先定义的具有临床意义的5分钟差值。术前宫颈扩张情况无差异,两组大多数受试者的宫颈扩张均>3cm。提供者报告的手术难易程度无差异(p = 0.6)。米非司酮组术前(米索前列醇后)疼痛和术后疼痛水平更高(分别为p = 0.02和p = 0.04)。总体受试者体验无差异(p = 0.80),大多数受试者报告“比预期更好”的体验。

结论

与连续(两组)渗透扩张器加米索前列醇相比,一组渗透扩张器加米非司酮和米索前列醇并未导致更长的手术时间或更少的宫颈扩张,并且有可能在不影响安全性的情况下改善中期妊娠流产的可及性。

启示

在妊娠19周后手术流产前使用米非司酮进行宫颈准备,可减少就诊次数和渗透扩张器的使用数量,而不影响宫颈扩张或增加手术时间。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验