Suppr超能文献

产科麻醉中调查的价值。

The value of surveys in obstetric anaesthesia.

作者信息

Robson E J, Campbell J P, Yentis S M

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK.

Department of Anaesthesia, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Int J Obstet Anesth. 2015 Feb;24(1):46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2014.08.007. Epub 2014 Sep 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association (OAA) has facilitated national surveys in obstetric anaesthesia since 1998. We wanted to examine trends in OAA-approved surveys since this time.

METHODS

OAA-approved surveys performed between January 1998 and December 2012 were examined for the year they were carried out, the format (postal or electronic), the target group and the response rate. We determined whether each survey was presented or published. For each survey published as a substantive paper, we identified the number of times the publication had been cited. We also surveyed lead obstetric anaesthetists and expert witnesses practising in obstetric anaesthesia on the perceived usefulness of OAA-approved surveys.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-five surveys approved by the OAA were carried out between 1998 and 2012. Response rates have fallen over the years, reaching a current plateau of 65%. Response rates varied with the target group. Seventy-eight percent of surveys were presented and 83% were published in some form. For surveys published as substantive papers (n=34, 25%), the median [IQR (range)] number of citations was 6 [3-11 (0-36)] per publication. Our survey of lead obstetric anaesthetists had a response rate of 62%. Those who replied rated OAA surveys a median [IQR (range)] of 6 [5-7 (1-9)] on a 0-10 scale of usefulness to their clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Response rates to OAA-approved surveys have declined but remain acceptable despite an increase in the number of surveys performed. Most surveys were presented or published in some form.

摘要

背景

自1998年以来,产科麻醉医师协会(OAA)一直在推动全国性的产科麻醉调查。我们希望研究自那时起OAA批准的调查的趋势。

方法

对1998年1月至2012年12月期间OAA批准的调查进行审查,内容包括调查开展的年份、形式(邮寄或电子)、目标群体和回复率。我们确定每项调查是否进行了展示或发表。对于作为实质性论文发表的每项调查,我们确定该出版物被引用的次数。我们还就OAA批准的调查的感知有用性,对从事产科麻醉工作的首席产科麻醉医师和专家证人进行了调查。

结果

1998年至2012年期间共开展了135项经OAA批准的调查。多年来回复率有所下降,目前稳定在65%。回复率因目标群体而异。78%的调查进行了展示,83%以某种形式发表。对于作为实质性论文发表的调查(n = 34,25%),每份出版物被引用的中位数[四分位间距(范围)]为6[3 - 11(0 - 36)]次。我们对首席产科麻醉医师的调查回复率为62%。回复者在0至10的有用性量表上对OAA调查的评分中位数[四分位间距(范围)]为6[5 - 7(1 - 9)],认为其对临床实践有用。

结论

OAA批准的调查的回复率有所下降,但尽管调查数量增加,仍可接受。大多数调查以某种形式进行了展示或发表。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验