Suppr超能文献

丙戊酸与氟哌啶醇治疗急性激越患者的疗效和安全性:一项随机、双盲、平行组试验的结果

Efficacy and safety of valproic acid versus haloperidol in patients with acute agitation: results of a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial.

作者信息

Asadollahi Shadi, Heidari Kamran, Hatamabadi Hamidreza, Vafaee Reza, Yunesian Somayeh, Azadbakht Alireza, Mirmohseni Ladan

机构信息

aSchool of Medicine bDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Imam Hossein Hospital cSafety Promotion and Injury Prevention Research Center dProteomics Research Center, Faculty of Paramedical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 17666-33815, Iran.

出版信息

Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015 May;30(3):142-50. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000064.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of valproate versus haloperidol in decreasing the agitation level in affected patients in the emergency department. We assigned 80 acutely agitated patients to receive either intravenous sodium valproate (20 mg/kg) or intramuscular haloperidol (5 mg/1 ml). Agitation was measured at baseline and 30 min after the first injection using the Agitation-Calmness Evaluation Scale (ACES), the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale-Excited Component subscale, and the Agitated Behavior Scale. For 80 patients treated with sodium valproate, the mean ± SD dosage was 1541.5 ± 286 mg (range 940-2400). The mean postintervention ACES scores from baseline to 30 min after drug injection were 4.73 (SD = 1.93) for the valproate group and 5.45 (SD = 2.09) for the haloperidol group (P = 0.028). No significant differences were observed in terms of the mean changes 30 min after the intervention for two additional agitation scales. A larger proportion of patients in the haloperidol group experienced intense sedation (36.2%, P < 0.001) and extrapyramidal symptoms (8.7%, P = 0.007) compared with the valproate group (2.5% for intense sedation, no patient for extrapyramidal symptoms). The findings suggest that in the clinical practice setting of emergency psychiatry, intravenous valproate is as effective as haloperidol in reducing agitation, with a better safety profile.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较丙戊酸盐与氟哌啶醇在降低急诊科受影响患者躁动水平方面的疗效。我们将80名急性躁动患者分配接受静脉注射丙戊酸钠(20mg/kg)或肌肉注射氟哌啶醇(5mg/1ml)。使用躁动-平静评估量表(ACES)、阳性和阴性症状量表-兴奋分量表以及躁动行为量表在基线和首次注射后30分钟测量躁动情况。对于80名接受丙戊酸钠治疗的患者,平均±标准差剂量为1541.5±286mg(范围940 - 2400)。从基线到药物注射后30分钟,丙戊酸盐组干预后的平均ACES评分是4.73(标准差 = 1.93),氟哌啶醇组是5.45(标准差 = 2.09)(P = 0.02)。在另外两个躁动量表上,干预后30分钟的平均变化方面未观察到显著差异。与丙戊酸盐组相比,氟哌啶醇组有更大比例的患者出现深度镇静(36.2%,P < 0.001)和锥体外系症状(8.7%,P = 0.007)(丙戊酸盐组深度镇静为2.5%,锥体外系症状无患者出现)。研究结果表明,在急诊精神病学的临床实践环境中,静脉注射丙戊酸盐在减轻躁动方面与氟哌啶醇一样有效,且安全性更好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验