Peng Feng, Su Jinzi, Lin Jinxiu, Niu Wenquan
*Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; and †State Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2015 Mar;65(3):262-8. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000189.
We sought to assess the impact of the pretreatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) for coronary intervention on the risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) after 72-hour postcontrast administration, together with a comprehensive meta-analysis in this aspect.
In this prospective study, 401 patients referred for percutaneous coronary intervention were enrolled with 134 patients in non-renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system group, 204 patients in ACEIs group and 63 patients in ARBs group. For further meta-analysis, articles were identified through PubMed, EMBASE, Wanfang, and VIP. Data extraction and study quality were assessed in duplicate. Altogether, 14 qualified trials (including this prospective study) with 1960 patients taking ACEIs or ARBs and 1457 patients receiving no renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers were analyzed. There was an overall 1.28-fold increased risk for CI-AKI in patients taking ACEIs or ARBs (odds ratio [OR] = 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-2.09; P = 0.315). Overall changes in serum creatinine, estimated GFR, and blood urea nitrogen were also nonsignificant. Subgroup analyses identified a significantly increased risk for CI-AKI in patients taking ARBs (OR = 3.31; 95% CI, 1.89-5.78; P < 0.0005), and no significance was observed for patients taking ACEIs (OR = 0.86; 95% CI, 043-1.72; P = 0.664). Also, patients taking ARBs had serum creatinine markedly increased by 0.05 mg/dL (95% CI, 0.02-0.09; P = 0.005).
The findings of this meta-analysis provide clear evidence for a deleterious impact of ARBs on the development of CI-AKI.
我们旨在评估血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEIs)或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARBs)预处理对冠状动脉介入治疗后造影剂注射72小时后发生对比剂诱导的急性肾损伤(CI-AKI)风险的影响,并对此进行全面的荟萃分析。
在这项前瞻性研究中,纳入了401例接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者,其中134例患者属于非肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统组,204例患者属于ACEIs组,63例患者属于ARBs组。为了进行进一步的荟萃分析,通过PubMed、EMBASE、万方和维普数据库检索相关文章。数据提取和研究质量评估由两人独立进行。总共分析了14项合格试验(包括这项前瞻性研究),其中1960例患者服用ACEIs或ARBs,1457例患者未接受肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统阻滞剂治疗。服用ACEIs或ARBs的患者发生CI-AKI的风险总体增加了1.28倍(比值比[OR]=1.28;95%置信区间[CI],0.79-2.09;P=0.315)。血清肌酐、估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)和血尿素氮的总体变化也无统计学意义。亚组分析发现,服用ARBs的患者发生CI-AKI的风险显著增加(OR=3.31;95%CI,1.89-5.78;P<0.0005),而服用ACEIs的患者未观察到显著差异(OR=0.86;95%CI,0.43-1.72;P=0.664)。此外,服用ARBs的患者血清肌酐显著升高0.05mg/dL(95%CI,0.02-0.09;P=0.005)。
这项荟萃分析的结果为ARBs对CI-AKI发生发展的有害影响提供了明确证据。