Vaisy Morad, Gizzi Leonardo, Petzke Frank, Consmüller Tobias, Pfingsten Michael, Falla Deborah
*Pain Clinic, Center for Anesthesiology, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Göttingen ‡Department of Neurorehabilitation Engineering, Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August University, Göttingen †Epionics Medical GmbH, Potsdam, Germany.
Clin J Pain. 2015 Oct;31(10):876-85. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000190.
Individuals with low back pain (LBP) present with alterations or limitations of spinal mobility. The identification of simple clinical methods for evaluating functional movement of the spine is necessary to allow quantification of the degree of movement impairment and permit monitoring of patient improvement with rehabilitation. This study evaluated movement of the spine in 20 patients with chronic nonspecific LBP compared with 19 pain-free participants using a novel measurement device that permits the dynamic assessment of spinal movement in a rapid and subject-specific manner.
Two flexible sensor strips were fixed paravertebrally to the spine with each sensor strip measuring angles in 12 predetermined, adjacent, 25-mm-long segments. Maximum range of motion (ROM) and average angular velocity (AAV) of lumbar and pelvic movement were measured within identical angular and temporal frames during the descending and ascending phase of active lumbar flexion, extension, rotation, and lateral flexion following a standard choreography. Participants with LBP completed a number of questionnaires including the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.
Across all movements, the individuals with LBP displayed 10% to 15% less ROM (P<0.05) and 15% to 30% less AAV (P<0.05) at both the pelvis and lumbar regions compared with controls. ROM as well as AAV, in most cases, were negatively correlated (R=-0.49 to -0.75) with the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory in the LBP group (all P<0.05) especially during the initial descending phase of movement.
This study provide support for the utility of this device for quantifying movement impairments in individuals with fairly low levels of LBP and general functional limitations. The results show that velocity measurements rather than ROM show the greatest differences in individuals with LBP compared with asymptomatic participants. Impaired lumbar and pelvis movement was correlated to the individuals with LBP's degree of anxiety, fear, and catastrophizing.
腰痛(LBP)患者存在脊柱活动度的改变或受限。识别用于评估脊柱功能运动的简单临床方法对于量化运动障碍程度以及监测患者康复进展十分必要。本研究使用一种新型测量设备,以快速且针对个体的方式动态评估脊柱运动,比较了20例慢性非特异性LBP患者与19名无疼痛参与者的脊柱运动情况。
将两条柔性传感器条带固定于脊柱旁,每条传感器条带测量12个预定的、相邻的25毫米长节段的角度。在主动腰椎前屈、后伸、旋转和侧屈的下降和上升阶段,按照标准编排,在相同的角度和时间框架内测量腰椎和骨盆运动的最大活动范围(ROM)和平均角速度(AAV)。LBP参与者完成了多项问卷,包括坦帕运动恐惧量表、疼痛灾难化量表和斯皮尔伯格状态-特质焦虑量表。
在所有运动中,与对照组相比,LBP患者在骨盆和腰椎区域的ROM减少了10%至15%(P<0.05),AAV减少了15%至30%(P<0.05)。在LBP组中,ROM和AAV在大多数情况下与坦帕运动恐惧量表、疼痛灾难化量表和斯皮尔伯格状态-特质焦虑量表呈负相关(R=-0.49至-0.75)(所有P<0.05),尤其是在运动的初始下降阶段。
本研究为该设备在量化轻度LBP和一般功能受限个体的运动障碍方面的实用性提供了支持。结果表明,与无症状参与者相比,LBP患者的速度测量而非ROM显示出最大差异。腰椎和骨盆运动受损与LBP患者的焦虑、恐惧和灾难化程度相关。