Bierma T J, Toohey R E
Department of Health Sciences, Illinois State University, Normal 61761.
Health Phys. 1989 Sep;57(3):429-37. doi: 10.1097/00004032-198909000-00009.
In the evaluation of lung cancer risk from Rn daughters in the home environment, measurements of Rn concentration or potential alpha-energy concentration (PAEC) have served as proxies for actual radiation dose to the lungs. This paper uses a single-compartment room model, model parameters from a number of recent studies, and Monte Carlo analysis to explore the relative value of Rn concentration, PAEC, and room surface deposition, or plate-out, as estimators of lung dose. Results indicate that Rn concentration and PAEC are fairly good estimators, explaining roughly 50-70% of the variation in dose for the conditions studied, over the range of Rn concentrations considered (74-555 Bq m 3). The relative advantage of one measure over the other depends upon the variability in a number of factors across the houses being evaluated. Room surface activity deposition was not found to be superior to the traditional measures of Rn concentration and PAEC. Significant room for improvement remains in the development of simple home monitors providing an improved estimation of lung dose.
在评估家庭环境中氡子体导致的肺癌风险时,氡浓度或潜在α能量浓度(PAEC)的测量已被用作肺部实际辐射剂量的替代指标。本文使用单室房间模型、近期多项研究的模型参数以及蒙特卡罗分析,来探讨氡浓度、PAEC和房间表面沉积(或沉降)作为肺部剂量估算指标的相对价值。结果表明,在考虑的氡浓度范围(74 - 555 Bq m³)内,氡浓度和PAEC是相当不错的估算指标,在所研究的条件下,能解释大约50 - 70%的剂量变化。一种测量方法相对于另一种测量方法的相对优势取决于被评估房屋中多个因素的变异性。未发现房间表面活性物质沉积优于氡浓度和PAEC的传统测量方法。在开发能够更好估算肺部剂量的简单家用监测仪方面,仍有很大的改进空间。