Wendt Mike, Luna-Rodriguez Aquiles, Jacobsen Thomas
Helmut-Schmidt-University/University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, Experimental Psychology Unit, 22043 Hamburg, Germany
Helmut-Schmidt-University/University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, Experimental Psychology Unit, 22043 Hamburg, Germany.
J Neurosci. 2014 Dec 10;34(50):16720-5. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0754-14.2014.
Humans are selective information processors who efficiently prevent goal-inappropriate stimulus information to gain control over their actions. Nonetheless, stimuli, which are both unnecessary for solving a current task and liable to cue an incorrect response (i.e., "distractors"), frequently modulate task performance, even when consistently paired with a physical feature that makes them easily discernible from target stimuli. Current models of cognitive control assume adjustment of the processing of distractor information based on the overall distractor utility (e.g., predictive value regarding the appropriate response, likelihood to elicit conflict with target processing). Although studies on distractor interference have supported the notion of utility-based processing adjustment, previous evidence is inconclusive regarding the specificity of this adjustment for distractor information and the stage(s) of processing affected. To assess the processing of distractors during sensory-perceptual phases we applied EEG recording in a stimulus identification task, involving successive distractor-target presentation, and manipulated the overall distractor utility. Behavioral measures replicated previously found utility modulations of distractor interference. Crucially, distractor-evoked visual potentials (i.e., posterior N1) were more pronounced in high-utility than low-utility conditions. This effect generalized to distractors unrelated to the utility manipulation, providing evidence for item-unspecific adjustment of early distractor processing to the experienced utility of distractor information.
人类是有选择性的信息处理器,能够有效地阻止与目标不相关的刺激信息,从而控制自己的行为。然而,对于解决当前任务既不必要又容易引发错误反应(即“干扰项”)的刺激,即使它们始终与一种使其易于与目标刺激区分开来的物理特征配对,也经常会影响任务表现。当前的认知控制模型假定,基于干扰项的整体效用(例如,关于适当反应的预测价值、引发与目标处理冲突的可能性)来调整对干扰项信息的处理。尽管关于干扰项干扰的研究支持了基于效用的处理调整这一概念,但先前的证据对于这种调整针对干扰项信息的特异性以及受影响的处理阶段尚无定论。为了评估感觉-知觉阶段干扰项的处理情况,我们在一个刺激识别任务中应用脑电图记录,该任务涉及连续呈现干扰项-目标,并操纵干扰项的整体效用。行为测量结果重现了先前发现的干扰项干扰的效用调制。至关重要的是,在高效用条件下,干扰项诱发的视觉电位(即后部N1)比低效用条件下更明显。这种效应推广到了与效用操纵无关的干扰项,为早期干扰项处理根据干扰项信息的经验效用进行项目非特异性调整提供了证据。