Roversi R, Ricci S, Rossi C, Gambari P, Galaverni M C, Teodorani A, Gardini G
Instituto di Radiologia, Università, Bologna.
Radiol Med. 1989 Jul-Aug;78(1-2):44-52.
Fifty patients with HCC associated with hepatic cirrhosis underwent intra-arterial injection of Lipiodol UltraFluid (LUF) during diagnostic DSA of liver parenchyma, 42 of them for a complete chemotherapeutic treatment, 8 for an isolated diagnostic control. LUF is known to be specifically captured by HCC neoplastic tissue, with long-term persistence in the lesion if injected in the arterial hepatic tree; this is not the case with other focal hepatic masses. Therefore LUF opacification can be used to demonstrate small daughter tumors not shown by CT or US in cases with evidence of HCC, or to diagnosis HCC in clinically positive patients with no evidence of tumor at non-invasive screening. In our series of patients, accumulation of LUF in the HCC was observed in 100% of the cases, with no false negatives. Two false positives (4%) were observed, due to CT being performed too early (it should be performed not sooner than 10 days after the injection). Overall DSA accuracy was 78%, with 22% false negatives. In 14% of the cases DSA was positive for HCC in patients with aspecific noninvasive screening. CT, performed 10 days after LUF injection, demonstrated HCC daughter tumors not depicted by US, conventional CT, and angiography, in 34% of the cases, and in 9% of the patients only CT/LUF was able to show HCC in clinically positive cases with no evidence of tumor on other imaging techniques. Specificity, sensitivity and over-all accuracy were thus 100% in our series; LUF was well tolerated by the patients, and no technical complications were observed. In our opinion, the diagnostic DSA and CT/LUF is justified only for the typification of suspected focal nodules unsuitable for biopsy: in other instances, especially in case of HCC with positive biopsy/clinical findings and focal nodular mass, the technique should be directly employed as a therapeutic approach, with the injection of lipiodolized agents to treat both primary and daughter nodules after surgery in operable patients, and to begin chemoembolization treatment in patients with intrahepatic polyfocal diffusion. DSA and LUF are therefore of primary importance in the diagnosis and therapeutic flow-chart of HCC associated with hepatic cirrhosis.
50例伴有肝硬化的肝癌患者在肝脏实质诊断性数字减影血管造影(DSA)期间接受了超液化碘油(LUF)肝动脉内注射,其中42例进行了完整的化疗,8例仅用于诊断对照。已知LUF可被肝癌肿瘤组织特异性摄取,如果注入肝动脉分支,可在病变中长期留存;其他肝脏局灶性肿块则不然。因此,在有肝癌证据的病例中,LUF造影可用于显示CT或超声未发现的小的子瘤,或在无创筛查无肿瘤证据但临床呈阳性的患者中诊断肝癌。在我们的患者系列中,100%的病例观察到LUF在肝癌中蓄积,无假阴性。观察到2例假阳性(4%),原因是CT检查进行得太早(应在注射后不少于10天进行)。总体DSA准确率为78%,假阴性率为22%。在14%的病例中,无创筛查无特异性的患者DSA显示肝癌阳性。在LUF注射10天后进行的CT检查显示,34%的病例中发现了超声、传统CT和血管造影未显示的肝癌子瘤,9%的患者中仅CT/LUF能够在其他影像技术未发现肿瘤但临床呈阳性的病例中显示肝癌。因此,我们系列中的特异性、敏感性和总体准确率均为100%;患者对LUF耐受性良好,未观察到技术并发症。我们认为,诊断性DSA和CT/LUF仅适用于对不适合活检的可疑局灶性结节进行分型:在其他情况下,尤其是活检/临床结果呈阳性且有局灶性结节性肿块的肝癌病例中,该技术应直接用作治疗方法,对可手术患者在术后注射碘化油制剂治疗原发瘤和子瘤,并对肝内多灶性扩散的患者开始化疗栓塞治疗。因此,DSA和LUF在伴有肝硬化的肝癌的诊断和治疗流程中至关重要。