Yang Lixia, Tian Xiangquan, Guo Ruiwei, Liu Hong, Qi Feng, Ye Jinshan
Department of Cardiology, Kunming General Hospital, Chengdu Military Command, Kunming 650032, China. Email:
Department of Cardiology, Kunming General Hospital, Chengdu Military Command, Kunming 650032, China.
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2014 Sep;42(9):740-3.
To explore the association between extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer (EMMPRIN) and urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and the severity of coronary artery lesions in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients.
This study enrolled 88 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and 46 patients with stable angina pectoris (SAP). The mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of EMMPRIN on monocytes of peripheral blood (PBMCs) were examined by flow cytometry. uPA in serum was measured with ELISA . 64-slice spiral computed tomography coronary artery imaging was performed in 108 CHD patients. Coronary artery plaques were divided into type I (33 patients), type II (59 patients) and type III (44 patients) through plaque morphology characteristics according to coronary angiography. Coronary artery plaques were divided into soft (42 patients), fibrous (34 patients) and calcified plaque (32 patients) according to CT characteristics.
(1) Type II plaque (48 patients) and soft plaque (35 patients) were the major plaque types in the ACS patients, while type Iplaque (20 patients) and type III plaque (17 patients) and fibrous plaque (16 patients) and calcified plaque (22 patients) were the major plaque types in the SAP patients. (2) The EMMPRIN expression and uPA levels were significantly higher in typeII plaque group (EMMPRIN MFI: 11.61 ± 0.81, uPA: (0.89 ± 0.17) mg/L) than those in the typeIplaque group (EMMPRIN MFI: 6.65 ± 1.32, uPA: (0.53 ± 0.06) mg/L) and in the type III plaque group (EMMPRIN MFI: 9.47 ± 1.16, uPA:(0.56 ± 0.04) mg/L, all P < 0.05). The EMMPRIN expression was higher in the typeIII plaque group (MFI: 9.47 ± 1.16) than in the typeIplaque group (MFI:6.65 ± 1.32, P < 0.05), but uPA levels were similar between the 2 groups ((0.56 ± 0.04) mg/L vs. (0.53 ± 0.06) mg/L). (3) The EMMPRIN expression and uPA levels in the soft plaque group (EMMPRIN MFI:11.37 ± 0.76, uPA: (0.97 ± 0.12)mg/L) were significantly higher than those in the fibrous plaque group (EMMPRIN MFI: 8.93 ± 1.21), uPA:(0.52 ± 0.09) mg/L) and calcified plaque group (EMMPRIN MFI: 6.94 ± 1.19, uPA:(0.49 ± 0.12) mg/L, P < 0.05). The EMMPRIN expression in the fibrous plaque group (MFI:8.93 ± 1.21) was higher than in the calcified plaque group (MFI:6.94 ± 1.19, P < 0.05), but uPA levels were similar between the two groups.
Higher EMMPRIN expression and uPA levels were associated with plaque instability, which might be used to evaluate plaque stability in CHD patients.
探讨细胞外基质金属蛋白酶诱导剂(EMMPRIN)和尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活剂(uPA)与冠心病(CHD)患者冠状动脉病变严重程度之间的关联。
本研究纳入88例急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者和46例稳定型心绞痛(SAP)患者。采用流式细胞术检测外周血单核细胞(PBMCs)上EMMPRIN的平均荧光强度(MFI)。用酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)检测血清中的uPA。对108例CHD患者进行64排螺旋计算机断层扫描冠状动脉成像。根据冠状动脉造影的斑块形态特征,将冠状动脉斑块分为I型(33例患者)、II型(59例患者)和III型(44例患者)。根据CT特征,将冠状动脉斑块分为软斑块(42例患者)、纤维斑块(34例患者)和钙化斑块(32例患者)。
(1)II型斑块(48例患者)和软斑块(35例患者)是ACS患者的主要斑块类型,而I型斑块(20例患者)、III型斑块(17例患者)、纤维斑块(16例患者)和钙化斑块(22例患者)是SAP患者的主要斑块类型。(2)II型斑块组的EMMPRIN表达和uPA水平(EMMPRIN MFI:11.61±0.81,uPA:(0.89±0.17)mg/L)显著高于I型斑块组(EMMPRIN MFI:6.65±1.32,uPA:(0.53±0.06)mg/L)和III型斑块组(EMMPRIN MFI:9.47±1.16,uPA:(0.56±0.04)mg/L,均P<0.05)。III型斑块组的EMMPRIN表达高于I型斑块组(MFI:9.47±1.16比6.65±1.32,P<0.05),但两组的uPA水平相似((0.56±0.04)mg/L比(0.53±0.06)mg/L)。(3)软斑块组的EMMPRIN表达和uPA水平(EMMPRIN MFI:11.37±0.76,uPA:(0.97±0.12)mg/L)显著高于纤维斑块组(EMMPRIN MFI:8.93±1.21,uPA:(0.52±0.09)mg/L)和钙化斑块组(EMMPRIN MFI:6.94±1.19,uPA:(0.49±0.12)mg/L,P<0.05)。纤维斑块组的EMMPRIN表达高于钙化斑块组(MFI:8.93±1.21比6.94±1.19,P<0.05),但两组的uPA水平相似。
较高的EMMPRIN表达和uPA水平与斑块不稳定性相关,这可能用于评估CHD患者的斑块稳定性。