Suppr超能文献

在原发性免疫性血小板减少症中,在使用罗米司亭后使用艾曲泊帕。

Use of eltrombopag after romiplostim in primary immune thrombocytopenia.

作者信息

González-Porras José Ramón, Mingot-Castellano María Eva, Andrade Marcio M, Alonso Rafael, Caparrós Isabel, Arratibel María Carmen, Fernández-Fuertes Fernando, Cortti Maria José, Pascual Cristina, Sánchez-González Blanca, Bernat Silvia, Fuertes-Palacio Miguel Angel, Vázquez-Paganini Juan Andrés, Olivera Pavel E, Alvarez-Román María Teresa, Jarque Isidro, Cortés Montserrat, Martínez-Robles Violeta, Díaz-Gálvez Francisco Javier, Calbacho María, Fernández-Miñano Carmen, Garcia-Frade Javier, González-López Tomás José

机构信息

Department of Haematology, IBSAL-Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.

出版信息

Br J Haematol. 2015 Apr;169(1):111-6. doi: 10.1111/bjh.13266. Epub 2014 Dec 18.

Abstract

The thrombopoietin receptor agonists (THPO-RAs), romiplostim and eltrombopag, are effective and safe in immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). However, the value of their sequential use when no response is achieved or when adverse events occur with one THPO-RA has not been clearly established. Here we retrospectively evaluated 51 primary ITP adult patients treated with romiplostim followed by eltrombopag. The median age of our cohort was 49 (range, 18-83) years. There were 32 women and 19 men. The median duration of romiplostim use before switching to eltrombopag was 12 (interquartile range 5-21) months. The reasons for switching were: lack of efficacy (n = 25), patient preference (n = 16), platelet-count fluctuation (n = 6) and side-effects (n = 4). The response rate to eltrombopag was 80% (41/51), including 67% (n = 35) complete responses. After a median follow-up of 14 months, 31 patients maintained their response. Efficacy was maintained after switching in all patients in the patient preference, platelet-count fluctuation and side-effect groups. 33% of patients experienced one or more adverse events during treatment with eltrombopag. We consider the use of eltrombopag after romiplostim for treating ITP to be effective and safe. Response to eltrombopag was related to the cause of romiplostim discontinuation.

摘要

血小板生成素受体激动剂(THPO-RAs),即罗米司亭和艾曲泊帕,在免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)的治疗中有效且安全。然而,当使用一种THPO-RA未取得反应或出现不良事件时,其序贯使用的价值尚未明确确立。在此,我们回顾性评估了51例接受罗米司亭治疗后改用艾曲泊帕的原发性ITP成年患者。我们队列的中位年龄为49岁(范围18 - 83岁)。其中女性32例,男性19例。在改用艾曲泊帕之前,罗米司亭的中位使用时长为12个月(四分位间距5 - 21个月)。改用的原因包括:疗效不佳(n = 25)、患者偏好(n = 16)、血小板计数波动(n = 6)和副作用(n = 4)。艾曲泊帕的反应率为80%(41/51),其中完全缓解率为67%(n = 35)。中位随访14个月后,31例患者维持了反应。在患者偏好、血小板计数波动和副作用组中,所有改用的患者在改用后疗效得以维持。33%的患者在使用艾曲泊帕治疗期间经历了一种或多种不良事件。我们认为罗米司亭后使用艾曲泊帕治疗ITP是有效且安全的。对艾曲泊帕的反应与停用罗米司亭的原因相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验