Temelkovska-Stevanovska Marina, Durnev Vesna, Jovanovski-Srceva Marija, Mojsova-Mijovska Maja, Trpeski Sime
Univeristy Anesthesia, Reanimation and Intensive Care Clinic, Medical Faculty, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, R. Macedonia.
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2014;35(2):85-93. doi: 10.2478/prilozi-2014-0011.
Systemic postoperative analgesia is inefficient in most patients with hip fracture, which is the reason for pain, especially during leg movement. Peripheral and plexus nerve blocks are an efficient option for postoperative pain relief. The aim of this study was to compare the effect and duration of continuous FNB versus a single FIC block as a postoperative analgesia in patients with hip fracture.
Sixty patients with hip fracture were included and were randomly assigned to two groups of 30 patients: FNB group - patients with continuous femoral nerve block; and FIC group -patients with a single fascia iliaca compartment block. In all patients, pain intensity was measured at rest and in passive leg movement by using VDS (0-4) at several intervals: 1, 2, 12, 24, 36 and 48 hours after intervention. The amount of supplemental analgesia was measured, together with the time when the patient needed it for the first time, as well as the side effects.
The values of VDS were significantly lower in patients with FNB block versus patients with FIC block in rest and movement at the 24-hour intervals (46.67% vs 0% felt moderate pain), after 36 hours (43.33% vs 0% felt moderate pain) and 48 hours after intervention (46.67% vs 3.33% felt moderate to severe pain) for p < 0.05. Patients with FNB block received a significantly lower amount of supplemental analgesia, 23.3% of the FNB group vs 50% of the FIC group (p < 0.05). Registered side effects were were nausea, dizziness and sedation, and they were statistically significantly more frequent in the FIC group (p < 0.05).
Pain relief in the postoperative period was superior in the FNB group versus the FIC group at rest and in movement in patients with hip fracture.
大多数髋部骨折患者术后全身镇痛效果不佳,这是疼痛的原因,尤其是在腿部活动时。外周和神经丛阻滞是术后缓解疼痛的有效选择。本研究的目的是比较持续股神经阻滞(FNB)与单次髂筋膜室阻滞(FIC)作为髋部骨折患者术后镇痛的效果和持续时间。
纳入60例髋部骨折患者,随机分为两组,每组30例:FNB组——接受持续股神经阻滞的患者;FIC组——接受单次髂筋膜室阻滞的患者。在所有患者中,于干预后1、2、12、24、36和48小时的多个时间点,通过视觉模拟评分法(VDS,0 - 4分)测量静息和被动腿部活动时的疼痛强度。测量补充镇痛药物的用量、患者首次需要补充镇痛药物的时间以及副作用。
在干预后24小时(静息和活动时VDS值:FNB组46.67%有中度疼痛,FIC组0%)、36小时(FNB组43.33%有中度疼痛,FIC组0%)和48小时(FNB组46.67%有中度至重度疼痛,FIC组3.33%),FNB组患者的VDS值显著低于FIC组患者,p < 0.05。FNB组患者接受的补充镇痛药物用量显著更低,FNB组为23.3%,FIC组为50%(p < 0.05)。记录到的副作用有恶心、头晕和镇静,FIC组的这些副作用在统计学上显著更常见(p < 0.05)。
髋部骨折患者术后,FNB组在静息和活动时的疼痛缓解优于FIC组。