Department of Biology, University of Eastern Finland PO Box 111, Joensuu, FI-80101, Finland ; Institute for Systematic Botany, University of Zurich, Zollikerstrasse 107 Zurich, CH-8008, Switzerland.
Department of Biology, University of Eastern Finland PO Box 111, Joensuu, FI-80101, Finland.
Ecol Evol. 2014 Sep;4(17):3420-34. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1193. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
Island populations are on average smaller, genetically less diverse, and at a higher risk to go extinct than mainland populations. Low genetic diversity may elevate extinction probability, but the genetic component of the risk can be affected by the mode of diversity loss, which, in turn, is connected to the demographic history of the population. Here, we examined the history of genetic erosion in three Fennoscandian ringed seal subspecies, of which one inhabits the Baltic Sea 'mainland' and two the 'aquatic islands' composed of Lake Saimaa in Finland and Lake Ladoga in Russia. Both lakes were colonized by marine seals after their formation c. 9500 years ago, but Lake Ladoga is larger and more contiguous than Lake Saimaa. All three populations suffered dramatic declines during the 20th century, but the bottleneck was particularly severe in Lake Saimaa. Data from 17 microsatellite loci and mitochondrial control-region sequences show that Saimaa ringed seals have lost most of the genetic diversity present in their Baltic ancestors, while the Ladoga population has experienced only minor reductions. Using Approximate Bayesian computing analyses, we show that the genetic uniformity of the Saimaa subspecies derives from an extended founder event and subsequent slow erosion, rather than from the recent bottleneck. This suggests that the population has persisted for nearly 10,000 years despite having low genetic variation. The relatively high diversity of the Ladoga population appears to result from a high number of initial colonizers and a high post-colonization population size, but possibly also by a shorter isolation period and/or occasional gene flow from the Baltic Sea.
岛屿种群的平均规模较小,遗传多样性较低,灭绝的风险高于大陆种群。遗传多样性的降低可能会增加灭绝的概率,但风险的遗传成分可能会受到多样性丧失模式的影响,而多样性丧失模式又与种群的历史有关。在这里,我们研究了三个芬诺斯堪的亚环斑海豹亚种的遗传侵蚀历史,其中一个亚种栖息在波罗的海“大陆”,另外两个亚种栖息在芬兰的塞马湖和俄罗斯的拉多加湖这两个“水生岛屿”。这两个湖泊都是在大约 9500 年前形成后被海洋海豹殖民的,但拉多加湖比塞马湖更大且更连续。所有三个种群在 20 世纪都经历了急剧下降,但瓶颈期在塞马湖尤为严重。来自 17 个微卫星基因座和线粒体控制区序列的数据表明,塞马湖环斑海豹已经失去了其波罗的海祖先所拥有的大部分遗传多样性,而拉多加湖种群的遗传多样性仅略有减少。通过近似贝叶斯计算分析,我们表明塞马亚种群的遗传均匀性源于一个扩展的奠基者事件和随后的缓慢侵蚀,而不是最近的瓶颈期。这表明该种群在遗传变异率低的情况下已经持续了近 1 万年。拉多加湖种群相对较高的多样性似乎源于大量的初始殖民者和较高的殖民后种群规模,但也可能是由于较短的隔离期和/或偶尔从波罗的海的基因流。