Suppr超能文献

梭形细胞痣和梭形细胞恶性黑色素瘤中波形蛋白和肌动蛋白表达的比较。

Comparison of the expression of vimentin and actin in spitz nevi and spitzoid malignant melanomas.

作者信息

Alomari Ahmed K, Klump Vincent, Neumeister Veronique, Ariyan Stephan, Narayan Deepak, Lazova Rossitza

机构信息

*Departments of Pathology, †Dermatology, and ‡Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; and §Smilow Cancer Hospital, Yale Cancer Center.

出版信息

Am J Dermatopathol. 2015 Jan;37(1):46-51. doi: 10.1097/DAD.0000000000000147.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The differentiation between Spitz nevi (SN) and Spitzoid malignant melanomas (SMM) represents a challenge to dermatopathologists. We recently demonstrated differential expression of vimentin and Actin in SN and SMM by mass spectrometry (MS). We sought to investigate whether this differential expression could be detected using conventional immunohistochemistry or automated quantitative analysis (AQUA) of histological sections.

METHODS

Cases of SN and SMM, which were previously studied by MS and have readily available blocks and enough material in the block, were selected from the Yale Spitzoid Neoplasm Repository. The cases were stained for vimentin and muscle-specific actin using standard protocols. H-scores were calculated by multiplying the percentage of cells staining and the intensity of staining. Selected cases were also studied for quantitative immunofluorescent staining using the AQUA method.

RESULTS

All 21 cases of SN showed strong and diffuse staining for vimentin; 19 of 21 (91%) cases had an H-score of 300 (average, 294). Similar staining results were observed in SMM; 13 of 14 (93%) cases had an H-score of 300 (average, 297). Muscle-specific actin was weakly and focally positive in 5 of 21 (24%) SN (H-score = 3.3) and 5 of 14 (39%) SMM (H-score = 3.5). The AQUA method showed no significant difference in the staining intensity of SN and SMM for both vimentin and actin.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference in the expression of vimentin and actin in SN and SMM shown by conventional immunohistochemistry or the AQUA method. This study shows that MS has much grater sensitivity in detecting the differential expression of these proteins.

摘要

引言

Spitz痣(SN)与Spitz样恶性黑色素瘤(SMM)的鉴别诊断对皮肤病理学家来说是一项挑战。我们最近通过质谱分析(MS)证实了波形蛋白和肌动蛋白在SN和SMM中的差异表达。我们试图研究能否通过常规免疫组织化学或组织切片的自动定量分析(AQUA)检测到这种差异表达。

方法

从耶鲁Spitz样肿瘤库中选取先前经MS研究且有现成蜡块和蜡块中有足够材料的SN和SMM病例。采用标准方案对病例进行波形蛋白和肌肉特异性肌动蛋白染色。通过将细胞染色百分比与染色强度相乘来计算H评分。还使用AQUA方法对选定病例进行了定量免疫荧光染色研究。

结果

所有21例SN均显示波形蛋白强弥漫性染色;21例中有19例(91%)H评分为300(平均294)。SMM中观察到类似的染色结果;14例中有13例(93%)H评分为300(平均297)。21例SN中有5例(24%)肌肉特异性肌动蛋白呈弱局灶性阳性(H评分 = 3.3),14例SMM中有5例(39%)呈弱局灶性阳性(H评分 = 3.5)。AQUA方法显示SN和SMM在波形蛋白和肌动蛋白染色强度上无显著差异。

结论

常规免疫组织化学或AQUA方法显示SN和SMM中波形蛋白和肌动蛋白的表达无差异。本研究表明MS在检测这些蛋白质的差异表达方面具有更高的敏感性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验