Suppr超能文献

用于检测儿童和青少年重度抑郁症的症状筛查量表:可靠性、有效性和诊断效用的系统评价与荟萃分析

Symptom screening scales for detecting major depressive disorder in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of reliability, validity and diagnostic utility.

作者信息

Stockings Emily, Degenhardt Louisa, Lee Yong Yi, Mihalopoulos Cathrine, Liu Angus, Hobbs Megan, Patton George

机构信息

National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, 22-32 King Street, Randwick, New South Wales 2031, Australia.

National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, 22-32 King Street, Randwick, New South Wales 2031, Australia.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2015 Mar 15;174:447-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.11.061. Epub 2014 Dec 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Depression symptom screening scales are often used to determine a clinical diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD) in prevention research. The aim of this review is to systematically examine the reliability, validity and diagnostic utility of commonly used screening scales in depression prevention research among children and adolescents.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of the electronic databases PsycINFO, PsycEXTRA and Medline examining the reliability, validity and diagnostic utility of four commonly used depression symptom rating scales among children and adolescents: the Children׳s Depression Inventory (CDI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Center for Epidemiologic Studies - Depression Scale (CES-D) and the Reynolds Adolescent Depression Scale (RADS). We used univariate and bivariate random effects models to pool data and conducted metaregression to identify and explain causes of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

We identified 54 studies (66 data points, 34,542 participants). Across the four scales, internal reliability was 'good' (pooled estimate: 0.89, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.86-0.92). Sensitivity and specificity were 'moderate' (sensitivity: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.76-0.84; specificity: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.74-0.83). For studies that used a diagnostic interview to determine a diagnosis of MDD, positive predictive power for identifying true cases was mostly poor. Psychometric properties did not differ on the basis of study quality, sample type (clinical vs. nonclinical) or sample age (child vs. adolescent).

LIMITATIONS

Some analyses may have been underpowered to identify conditions in which test performance may vary, due to low numbers of studies with adequate data.

CONCLUSIONS

Commonly used depression symptom rating scales are reliable measures of depressive symptoms among adolescents; however, using cutoff scores to indicate clinical levels of depression may result in many false positives.

摘要

背景

在预防研究中,抑郁症状筛查量表常被用于确定重度抑郁症(MDD)的临床诊断。本综述的目的是系统地考察儿童和青少年抑郁预防研究中常用筛查量表的信度、效度及诊断效用。

方法

我们对电子数据库PsycINFO、PsycEXTRA和Medline进行了系统综述,考察儿童和青少年中四种常用抑郁症状评定量表的信度、效度及诊断效用:儿童抑郁量表(CDI)、贝克抑郁量表(BDI)、流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)和雷诺兹青少年抑郁量表(RADS)。我们使用单变量和双变量随机效应模型合并数据,并进行元回归以识别和解释异质性的原因。

结果

我们纳入了54项研究(66个数据点,34542名参与者)。在这四种量表中,内部信度为“良好”(合并估计值:0.89,95%置信区间(CI):0.86 - 0.92)。敏感性和特异性为“中等”(敏感性:0.80,95%CI:0.76 - 0.84;特异性:0.78,95%CI:0.74 - 0.83)。对于使用诊断访谈来确定MDD诊断的研究,识别真正病例的阳性预测能力大多较差。心理测量特性在研究质量、样本类型(临床与非临床)或样本年龄(儿童与青少年)方面没有差异。

局限性

由于有足够数据的研究数量较少,一些分析可能没有足够的效力来识别测试表现可能不同的情况。

结论

常用的抑郁症状评定量表是青少年抑郁症状的可靠测量工具;然而,使用临界分数来指示抑郁的临床水平可能会导致许多假阳性结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验