• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

穿孔性消化性溃疡的五年管理经验及常见死亡风险预测模型的验证 - 现有模型是否足够?一项回顾性队列研究。

Five year experience in management of perforated peptic ulcer and validation of common mortality risk prediction models - are existing models sufficient? A retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2015 Feb;14:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.12.022. Epub 2015 Jan 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.12.022
PMID:25560748
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Emergency surgery for perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Accurate and early risk stratification is important. The primary aim of this study is to validate the various existing MRPMs and secondary aim is to audit our experience of managing PPU.

METHODS

332 patients who underwent emergency surgery for PPU at a single intuition from January 2008 to December 2012 were studied. Clinical and operative details were collected. Four MRPMs: American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score, Boey's score, Mannheim peritonitis index (MPI) and Peptic ulcer perforation (PULP) score were validated.

RESULTS

Median age was 54.7 years (range 17-109 years) with male predominance (82.5%). 61.7% presented within 24 h of onset of abdominal pain. Median length of stay was 7 days (range 2-137 days). Intra-abdominal collection, leakage, re-operation and 30-day mortality rates were 8.1%, 2.1%, 1.2% and 7.2% respectively. All the four MRPMs predicted intra-abdominal collection and mortality; however, only MPI predicted leak (p = 0.01) and re-operation (p = 0.02) rates. The area under curve for predicting mortality was 75%, 72%, 77.2% and 75% for ASA score, Boey's score, MPI and PULP score respectively.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Emergency surgery for PPU has low morbidity and mortality in our experience. MPI is the only scoring system which predicts all - intra-abdominal collection, leak, reoperation and mortality. All four MRPMs had a similar and fair accuracy to predict mortality, however due to geographic and demographic diversity and inherent weaknesses of exiting MRPMs, quest for development of an ideal model should continue.

摘要

背景

穿孔性消化性溃疡(PPU)的急诊手术与较高的发病率和死亡率相关。准确且早期的风险分层很重要。本研究的主要目的是验证各种现有的 MRPM,并次要目的是审核我们对 PPU 的管理经验。

方法

研究了 2008 年 1 月至 2012 年 12 月期间在一家医院接受 PPU 急诊手术的 332 名患者。收集了临床和手术细节。对四种 MRPM 进行了验证:美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分、Boey 评分、曼海姆腹膜炎指数(MPI)和消化性溃疡穿孔(PULP)评分。

结果

中位年龄为 54.7 岁(范围 17-109 岁),男性居多(82.5%)。61.7%的患者在腹痛发作后 24 小时内就诊。中位住院时间为 7 天(范围 2-137 天)。腹腔内积液、漏液、再次手术和 30 天死亡率分别为 8.1%、2.1%、1.2%和 7.2%。所有四种 MRPM 均预测了腹腔内积液和死亡率;然而,只有 MPI 预测了漏液(p=0.01)和再次手术(p=0.02)的发生率。预测死亡率的曲线下面积分别为 ASA 评分、Boey 评分、MPI 和 PULP 评分的 75%、72%、77.2%和 75%。

讨论与结论

在我们的经验中,PPU 的急诊手术发病率和死亡率较低。MPI 是唯一可预测所有指标(腹腔内积液、漏液、再次手术和死亡率)的评分系统。所有四种 MRPM 预测死亡率的准确性相当,但由于地理和人口统计学的多样性以及现有 MRPM 的固有弱点,应该继续寻求开发理想的模型。

相似文献

1
Five year experience in management of perforated peptic ulcer and validation of common mortality risk prediction models - are existing models sufficient? A retrospective cohort study.穿孔性消化性溃疡的五年管理经验及常见死亡风险预测模型的验证 - 现有模型是否足够?一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2015 Feb;14:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.12.022. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
2
Laparoscopy is an available alternative to open surgery in the treatment of perforated peptic ulcers: a retrospective multicenter study.腹腔镜检查术是治疗消化性溃疡穿孔时替代开放手术的一种可行选择:一项回顾性多中心研究。
BMC Surg. 2018 Sep 25;18(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0413-4.
3
Perforated peptic ulcer: clinical presentation, surgical outcomes, and the accuracy of the Boey scoring system in predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality.穿孔性消化性溃疡:临床表现、手术结果以及Boey评分系统在预测术后发病率和死亡率方面的准确性。
World J Surg. 2009 Jan;33(1):80-5. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9796-1.
4
The Peptic Ulcer Perforation (PULP) score: a predictor of mortality following peptic ulcer perforation. A cohort study.消化性溃疡穿孔(PULP)评分:预测消化性溃疡穿孔患者的死亡率。一项队列研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 May;56(5):655-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02609.x. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
5
Scoring systems for outcome prediction in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.穿孔性消化性溃疡患者预后预测评分系统。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2013 Apr 10;21:25. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-21-25.
6
Fungal Isolates in Peritoneal Fluid Culture Do Not Impact Peri-Operative Outcomes of Peptic Ulcer Perforation.腹腔液培养真菌分离株并不影响消化性溃疡穿孔的围手术期结局。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2019 Dec;20(8):619-624. doi: 10.1089/sur.2019.024. Epub 2019 May 23.
7
What is the best predictor of mortality in perforated peptic ulcer disease? A population-based, multivariable regression analysis including three clinical scoring systems.穿孔性消化性溃疡疾病死亡率的最佳预测指标是什么?一项基于人群的多变量回归分析,包括三种临床评分系统。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Jul;18(7):1261-8. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2485-5. Epub 2014 Mar 8.
8
Validation of Boey's score in predicting morbidity and mortality in peptic perforation peritonitis in Northwestern India.博伊评分在预测印度西北部消化性穿孔性腹膜炎发病率和死亡率中的验证
Trop Gastroenterol. 2015 Oct-Dec;36(4):256-60. doi: 10.7869/tg.300.
9
Outcomes of omental patch repair in large or giant perforated peptic ulcer are comparable to gastrectomy.大或巨大穿孔性消化性溃疡行网膜片修补术的结果与胃切除术相当。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Dec;47(6):1745-1752. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01237-8. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
10
A Comparative Study between Peptic Ulcer Perforation Score, Mannheim Peritonitis Index, ASA Score, and Jabalpur Score in Predicting the Mortality in Perforated Peptic Ulcers.消化性溃疡穿孔评分、曼海姆腹膜炎指数、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分及贾巴尔普尔评分在预测消化性溃疡穿孔死亡率中的比较研究
Surg J (N Y). 2022 Aug 2;8(3):e162-e168. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1743526. eCollection 2022 Jul.

引用本文的文献

1
Does Seasonality Affect Peptic Ulcer Perforation? A Single-Center Retrospective Study.季节因素会影响消化性溃疡穿孔吗?一项单中心回顾性研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 May 22;61(6):945. doi: 10.3390/medicina61060945.
2
Emergency laparotomy preoperative risk assessment tool performance: A systematic review.急诊剖腹手术术前风险评估工具的性能:一项系统评价。
Surg Pract Sci. 2024 Oct 31;19:100264. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100264. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on short-term postoperative outcomes of emergency surgery for gastroduodenal perforation: A nationwide study in Japan based on the National Clinical Database.
新型冠状病毒肺炎大流行对胃十二指肠穿孔急诊手术短期术后结局的影响:基于日本全国临床数据库的全国性研究
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2024 Apr 15;8(5):795-806. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12806. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Simple severity scale for perforated peptic ulcer with generalized peritonitis: a derivation and internal validation study.伴有弥漫性腹膜炎的穿孔性消化性溃疡简易严重程度量表:一项推导与内部验证研究
Int J Surg. 2024 Nov 1;110(11):7134-7141. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002037.
5
Metabolic score tool for personalized acute pancreatitis prognosis: A multicenter analysis.代谢评分工具用于个体化急性胰腺炎预后预测:一项多中心分析。
Biomol Biomed. 2024 Mar 19;24(4):1004-1015. doi: 10.17305/bb.2024.10222.
6
Occam's razor or Hickam's dictum-COVID-19 is not a textbook aetiology of acute pancreatitis: A modified Naranjo Score appraisal.奥卡姆剃刀或希卡姆定律——COVID-19 不是急性胰腺炎的典型病因:改良 Naranjo 评分评估。
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Apr 7;29(13):2050-2063. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i13.2050.
7
Sarcopenia provides extra value outside the PULP score for predicting mortality in older patients with perforated peptic ulcers.肌少症除了 PULP 评分外,还能为预测老年穿孔性消化性溃疡患者的死亡率提供额外价值。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 May 4;23(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03946-7.
8
Perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) treatment: an Italian nationwide propensity score-matched cohort study investigating laparoscopic vs open approach.穿孔性消化性溃疡(PPU)的治疗:一项意大利全国倾向评分匹配队列研究,调查腹腔镜与开放手术的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jul;37(7):5137-5149. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09998-5. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
9
Saline irrigation versus gauze wiping and suction only for peritoneal decontamination during laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease.生理盐水冲洗与纱布擦拭加吸引在腹腔镜穿孔性消化性溃疡疾病修补术中用于腹腔去污的比较。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 20;13(1):1170. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-27471-0.
10
Are admission laboratory values in isolation meaningful for predicting surgical outcome in patients with perforated peptic ulcers?单独的入院实验室检查值对预测穿孔性消化性溃疡患者的手术结果有意义吗?
Surg Open Sci. 2022 Dec 7;11:62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2022.11.003. eCollection 2023 Jan.