Sun Ning-Zi, Maniatis Thomas
BMC Med Educ. 2014;14 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S18. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-S1-S18. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
Fuelled by concerns about resident health and patient safety, there is a general trend in many jurisdictions toward limiting the maximum duration of consecutive work to between 14 and 16 hours. The goal of this article is to assist institutions and residency programs to make a smooth transition from the previous 24- to 36-hour call system to this new model. We will first give an overview of the main types of coverage systems and their relative merits when considering various aspects of patient care and resident pedagogy. We will then suggest a practical step-by-step approach to designing, implementing, and monitoring a scheduling system centred on clinical and educational needs in the context of resident duty hour reform. The importance of understanding the impetus for change and of assessing the need for overall workflow restructuring will be explored throughout this process. Finally, as a practical example, we will describe a large, university-based teaching hospital network's transition from a traditional call-based system to a novel schedule that incorporates the new 16-hour duty limit.
出于对住院医师健康和患者安全的担忧,许多司法管辖区普遍倾向于将连续工作的最长时长限制在14至16小时之间。本文的目的是帮助机构和住院医师培训项目从前一个24至36小时值班制度平稳过渡到这种新模式。我们将首先概述主要的轮班覆盖系统类型,以及在考虑患者护理和住院医师教学的各个方面时它们各自的相对优点。然后,我们将提出一种切实可行的逐步方法,用于在住院医师值班时间改革的背景下,围绕临床和教育需求设计、实施和监控排班系统。在整个过程中,我们将探讨理解变革动力以及评估整体工作流程重组必要性的重要性。最后,作为一个实际例子,我们将描述一个大型的、以大学为基础的教学医院网络从传统的值班制系统向纳入新的16小时值班限制的新型排班的转变。