Biles Brian, Casillas Giselle, Guterman Stuart
Brian Biles (
Giselle Casillas is a policy analyst at the Kaiser Family Foundation. At the time the research on Medicare Advantage plans reported here was conducted, she was a senior research assistant in the Department of Health Policy at the George Washington University.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Jan;34(1):56-63. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0768.
Concern about the future growth of Medicare spending has led some in Congress and elsewhere to promote converting Medicare to a "premium support" system. Under premium support, Medicare would provide a "defined contribution" to each Medicare beneficiary to purchase either a Medicare Advantage (MA)-type private health plan or the traditional Medicare public plan. To better understand the implications of such a shift, we compared the average costs per beneficiary of providing Medicare benefits at the county level for traditional Medicare and four types of MA plans. We found that the relative costs of Medicare Advantage and traditional Medicare varied greatly by MA plan type and by geographic location. The costs of health maintenance organization-type plans averaged 7 percent less than those of traditional Medicare, but the costs of the more loosely structured preferred provider organization and private fee-for-service plans averaged 12-18 percent more than those of traditional Medicare. In some counties MA plan costs averaged 28 percent less than costs in traditional Medicare, while in other counties MA plan costs averaged 26 percent more than traditional Medicare costs. Enactment of a Medicare premium-support proposal could trigger cost increases for beneficiaries participating in Medicare Advantage as well as those in traditional Medicare.
对联邦医疗保险(Medicare)支出未来增长的担忧,促使国会及其他一些地方的人士推动将联邦医疗保险转变为“保费支持”体系。在保费支持体系下,联邦医疗保险将为每位参保人提供一笔“固定缴款”,用于购买医疗保险优势(MA)类别的私人健康保险计划或传统的联邦医疗保险公共计划。为了更好地理解这一转变的影响,我们比较了在县一级为传统联邦医疗保险和四种MA计划提供联邦医疗保险福利时每位受益人的平均成本。我们发现,医疗保险优势计划和传统联邦医疗保险的相对成本因MA计划类型和地理位置的不同而有很大差异。健康维护组织类型计划的成本平均比传统联邦医疗保险低7%,但结构较为松散的优选提供者组织和私人按服务收费计划的成本平均比传统联邦医疗保险高12% - 18%。在一些县,MA计划成本平均比传统联邦医疗保险成本低28%,而在其他县,MA计划成本平均比传统联邦医疗保险成本高26%。联邦医疗保险保费支持提案的颁布可能会引发参加医疗保险优势计划的受益人和参加传统联邦医疗保险的受益人成本增加。