[拉丁美洲和加勒比地区生物医学期刊对研究报告指南的遵循情况]
[Adherence to research reporting guidelines in biomedical journals in Latin America and the Caribbean].
作者信息
Glujovsky Demián, Villanueva Eleana, Reveiz Ludovic, Murasaki Renato
机构信息
Centro Cochrane Argentina, Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria.
Organización Panamericana de la Salud, Washington, Estados Unidos de América.
出版信息
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2014 Oct;36(4):232-7.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the familiarity of the editors of journals indexed in the LILACS database with the guidelines for reporting on and publishing research- promoted by the EQUATOR Network (Enhancing QUAlity and Transparency Of Health Research)-, the journals' requirements for use of the guidelines, and the editors' opinions regarding the reasons for the low rate of use.
METHODS
LILACS editors were surveyed by e-mail about the guidelines and their availability at the EQUATOR website, and about the requirements and difficulties in using them.
RESULTS
Of 802 editors, 16.4% answered the survey. More than half said they were not aware of the guidelines (especially STROBE and PRISMA) and 30% were familiar with the EQUATOR Network.
CONCLUSIONS
The first Latin American and Caribbean study on LILACS editors' familiarity with the guidelines revealed that more than half of them were not familiar either with the guidelines or the EQUATOR Network.
目的
评估拉丁美洲及加勒比地区健康科学文献数据库（LILACS）收录期刊的编辑对由赤道网络（提高健康研究的质量和透明度）推广的研究报告和发表指南的熟悉程度、期刊对使用这些指南的要求，以及编辑对指南使用率低的原因的看法。
方法
通过电子邮件对LILACS的编辑进行调查，询问有关指南及其在赤道网络网站上的获取情况，以及使用指南的要求和困难。
结果
在802名编辑中，16.4%回复了调查。超过一半的人表示他们不知道这些指南（尤其是加强流行病学观察性研究报告质量（STROBE）和系统评价和荟萃分析优先报告的项目（PRISMA）），30%的人熟悉赤道网络。
结论
关于LILACS编辑对指南熟悉程度的首次拉丁美洲和加勒比地区研究表明，超过一半的编辑对指南或赤道网络都不熟悉。
Zotero 插件