Suppr超能文献

美国是如何开展全国受血者血液警戒工作的?

How is national recipient hemovigilance conducted in the United States?

作者信息

Chung Koo-Whang, Harvey Alexis, Basavaraju Sridhar V, Kuehnert Matthew J

机构信息

Office of Blood, Organ and Other Tissue Safety, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging Zoonotic and Infectious Diseases, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2015 Apr;55(4):703-7. doi: 10.1111/trf.12980. Epub 2015 Jan 7.

Abstract

A national recipient hemovigilance system was introduced in the United States in 2010, when voluntary enrollment began as part of the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Hemovigilance Module. NHSN is a secure, Web-based surveillance system operated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and used by US health care facilities to report a variety of patient safety information. The Hemovigilance Module is used for comprehensive monitoring of transfusion-related adverse events. Participating facilities can utilize analytic tools available within the module to identify opportunities for enhancing transfusion safety, evaluate the effectiveness of interventions, and compare facility specific transfusion-related data to aggregate national estimates. Data may be voluntarily shared by facilities with external partners for patient safety improvement initiatives and to fulfill reporting mandates. We describe the key characteristics of the Hemovigilance Module, highlight the benefits for participating facilities, and discuss the use of reported data for establishing national estimates of transfusion-associated adverse events to identify gaps in transfusion safety and opportunities for interventions. National hemovigilance systems are essential to recognize gaps in transfusion safety and identify opportunities for interventions to improve patient safety and outcomes.

摘要

2010年,美国引入了全国受血者血液警戒系统,当时自愿登记作为国家医疗安全网络(NHSN)血液警戒模块的一部分开始实施。NHSN是一个由疾病控制与预防中心运营的基于网络的安全监测系统,美国医疗机构用它来报告各种患者安全信息。血液警戒模块用于全面监测输血相关不良事件。参与的医疗机构可以利用该模块内的分析工具来确定提高输血安全性的机会、评估干预措施的有效性,并将特定医疗机构的输血相关数据与全国汇总估计数进行比较。医疗机构可以自愿与外部合作伙伴共享数据,以推动患者安全改善举措并履行报告义务。我们描述了血液警戒模块的关键特征,强调了参与医疗机构的益处,并讨论了如何利用报告数据来建立输血相关不良事件的全国估计数,以识别输血安全方面的差距和干预机会。全国血液警戒系统对于识别输血安全方面的差距以及确定改善患者安全和结局的干预机会至关重要。

相似文献

1
How is national recipient hemovigilance conducted in the United States?
Transfusion. 2015 Apr;55(4):703-7. doi: 10.1111/trf.12980. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
3
Transfusion-Transmitted Infections Reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network Hemovigilance Module.
Transfus Med Rev. 2019 Apr;33(2):84-91. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2019.01.001. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
8
How do we use the National Healthcare Safety Network for Hemovigilance in Massachusetts?
Transfusion. 2024 Feb;64(2):200-209. doi: 10.1111/trf.17689. Epub 2023 Dec 30.
10
Proposing a Model for the National Hemovigilance Information System in Iran.
J Med Life. 2020 Apr-Jun;13(2):211-218. doi: 10.25122/jml-2019-0112.

引用本文的文献

1
Incomplete tissue product tracing during an investigation of a tissue-derived tuberculosis outbreak.
Am J Transplant. 2024 Jan;24(1):115-122. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.09.005. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
2
Transfusion reactions in pediatric and adolescent young adult haematology oncology and immune effector cell patients.
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Sep 9;26:100514. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100514. eCollection 2020 Sep.
3
Determining the true incidence of acute transfusion reactions: Active surveillance at a specialized liver center.
Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 2020 Oct-Dec;42(4):326-332. doi: 10.1016/j.htct.2019.09.006. Epub 2019 Nov 30.
4
Transfusion-Transmitted Infections Reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network Hemovigilance Module.
Transfus Med Rev. 2019 Apr;33(2):84-91. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2019.01.001. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
6
A multicentre study investigating vital sign changes occurring in complicated and uncomplicated transfusions.
Vox Sang. 2018 Feb;113(2):160-169. doi: 10.1111/vox.12621. Epub 2017 Dec 25.
7
Incidence of transfusion reactions: a multicenter study utilizing systematic active surveillance and expert adjudication.
Transfusion. 2016 Oct;56(10):2587-2596. doi: 10.1111/trf.13730. Epub 2016 Jul 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of hemovigilance data to evaluate the effectiveness of diversion and bacterial detection.
Transfusion. 2011 Jul;51(7):1405-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.03001.x. Epub 2011 Jan 7.
2
The first data from the haemovigilance system in Italy.
Blood Transfus. 2007 Apr;5(2):66-74. doi: 10.2450/2007.0001-07.
4
Serious hazards of transfusion: a decade of hemovigilance in the UK.
Transfus Med Rev. 2006 Oct;20(4):273-82. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2006.05.002.
5
The Quebec hemovigilance system: description and results from the first two years.
Transfus Apher Sci. 2004 Oct;31(2):111-22. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2004.07.005.
6
Worldwide overview of existing haemovigilance systems.
Transfus Apher Sci. 2004 Oct;31(2):99-110. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2004.07.004.
8
Transfusion errors in New York State: an analysis of 10 years' experience.
Transfusion. 2000 Oct;40(10):1207-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2000.40101207.x.
9
Identification and classification of the causes of events in transfusion medicine.
Transfusion. 1998 Nov-Dec;38(11-12):1071-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1998.38111299056319.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验