Suppr超能文献

比伐卢定与肝素联合或不联合糖蛋白 IIb/IIIa 抑制剂用于行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者:来自 HORIZONS-AMI 和 EUROMAX 试验的汇总患者水平分析。

Bivalirudin versus heparin with or without glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: pooled patient-level analysis from the HORIZONS-AMI and EUROMAX trials.

机构信息

Columbia University Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York.

Mount Sinai Medical Center and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Jan 6;65(1):27-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.10.029.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the HORIZONS-AMI (Harmonizing Outcomes with RevasculariZatiON and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial, 3,602 patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with bivalirudin had lower bleeding and mortality rates, but higher acute stent thrombosis rates compared with heparin + a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI). Subsequent changes in primary PCI, including the use of potent P2Y12 inhibitors, frequent radial intervention, and pre-hospital medication administration, were incorporated into the EUROMAX (European Ambulance Acute Coronary Syndrome Angiography) trial, which assigned 2,218 patients to bivalirudin versus heparin ± GPI before primary PCI.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to examine the outcomes of procedural anticoagulation with bivalirudin versus heparin ± GPI for primary PCI, given the evolution in primary PCI.

METHODS

Databases from HORIZONS-AMI and EUROMAX were pooled for patient-level analysis. The Breslow-Day test evaluated heterogeneity between trials.

RESULTS

A total of 5,800 patients were randomized to bivalirudin (n = 2,889) or heparin ± GPI (n = 2,911). The radial approach was used in 21.3% of patients, prasugrel/ticagrelor was used in 18.1% of patients, and GPI was used in 84.8% of the control group. Bivalirudin compared with heparin ± GPI resulted in reduced 30-day rates of major bleeding (4.2% vs. 7.8%; relative risk [RR]: 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43 to 0.66; p < 0.0001), thrombocytopenia (1.4% vs. 2.9%, RR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.71; p = 0.0002), and cardiac mortality (2.0% vs. 2.9%; RR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.50 to 0.97; p = 0.03), with nonsignificantly different rates of reinfarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stroke, and all-cause mortality. Bivalirudin resulted in increased acute (<24 h) stent thrombosis rates (1.2% vs. 0.2%; RR: 6.04; 95% CI: 2.55 to 14.31; p < 0.0001), with nonsignificantly different rates of subacute stent thrombosis. Composite net adverse clinical events were lower with bivalirudin (8.8% vs. 11.9%; RR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.63 to 0.86; p < 0.0001). There was no significant heterogeneity between the 2 trials for these outcomes, and results were consistent across major subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite increased acute stent thrombosis, primary PCI with bivalirudin improved 30-day net clinical outcomes, with significant reductions in major bleeding, thrombocytopenia, and transfusions compared with heparin ± GPI, results that were consistent with evolution in PCI technique and pharmacotherapy. (Harmonizing Outcomes with RevasculariZatiON and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction [HORIZONS-AMI]; NCT00433966) (European Ambulance Acute Coronary Syndrome Angiography [EUROMAX]; NCT01087723).

摘要

背景

在 HORIZONS-AMI(急性心肌梗死血管再通和支架治疗的结果协调)试验中,3602 名接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者接受比伐卢定治疗,与肝素+糖蛋白 IIb/IIIa 抑制剂(GPI)相比,出血和死亡率较低,但急性支架血栓形成率较高。随后,包括使用强效 P2Y12 抑制剂、频繁的桡动脉介入治疗和院前药物治疗在内的主要 PCI 治疗方法发生了变化,这些变化被纳入 EUROMAX(欧洲救护车急性冠状动脉综合征血管造影)试验,该试验将 2218 名患者随机分配至比伐卢定与肝素±GPI 治疗行 PCI 前。

目的

本研究的目的是检查在主要 PCI 中使用比伐卢定与肝素±GPI 进行抗凝的结果,因为主要 PCI 治疗方法发生了变化。

方法

对 HORIZONS-AMI 和 EUROMAX 的数据库进行汇总,进行患者水平分析。Breslow-Day 检验评估了试验间的异质性。

结果

共有 5800 名患者被随机分配至比伐卢定(n=2889)或肝素±GPI(n=2911)组。21.3%的患者采用桡动脉入路,18.1%的患者使用普拉格雷/替格瑞洛,对照组 84.8%的患者使用 GPI。与肝素±GPI 相比,比伐卢定治疗可降低 30 天的大出血发生率(4.2% vs. 7.8%;相对风险[RR]:0.53;95%置信区间[CI]:0.43 至 0.66;p<0.0001)、血小板减少症发生率(1.4% vs. 2.9%;RR:0.48;95%CI:0.33 至 0.71;p=0.0002)和心脏死亡率(2.0% vs. 2.9%;RR:0.70;95%CI:0.50 至 0.97;p=0.03),而再梗死、缺血驱动的血运重建、卒中和全因死亡率无显著差异。比伐卢定治疗的急性(<24 小时)支架血栓形成率较高(1.2% vs. 0.2%;RR:6.04;95%CI:2.55 至 14.31;p<0.0001),但亚急性支架血栓形成率无显著差异。比伐卢定治疗的复合净临床不良事件发生率较低(8.8% vs. 11.9%;RR:0.74;95%CI:0.63 至 0.86;p<0.0001)。这两个试验之间对于这些结果没有显著的异质性,并且结果在主要亚组中是一致的。

结论

尽管急性支架血栓形成率增加,但与肝素±GPI 相比,比伐卢定行 PCI 治疗可改善 30 天净临床结局,显著降低大出血、血小板减少症和输血的发生率,这与 PCI 技术和药物治疗的发展一致。(急性心肌梗死血管再通和支架治疗的结果协调[HORIZONS-AMI];NCT00433966)(欧洲救护车急性冠状动脉综合征血管造影[EUROMAX];NCT01087723)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验