Huang Bing-Yao, Shih Yi-Fen, Chen Wen-Yin, Ma Hsiao-Li
Department of Physical Therapy and Assistive Technology, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Rehabilitation, Daqian General Hospital, Miaoli, Taiwan.
Department of Physical Therapy and Assistive Technology, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 May;96(5):920-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.01.001. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
To identify the predictors for successful neurodynamic management in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome.
Prospective cohort, prediction rule study.
Hospital.
Patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome (N=51) underwent clinical examination and measurement of physical parameters, including femoral slump test, lower-extremity alignment, flexibility and muscle strength, and functional level.
Patients received 6 treatment sessions of femoral nerve mobilization within 2 weeks.
Pain level during functional testing was assessed before and after the first and sixth session of treatment. Patients were then grouped into responder and nonresponder groups. Criteria for the responder group was a pain score decrease ≥50% or Global Rating Scale score ≥4. Chi-square and independent t tests were used to identify potential variables with a significance level of .10, and stepwise logistic regression was used to find predictors with a significance level of .05.
Twenty-five patients responded to the initial treatment (immediate effect), and 28 patients responded after 6 sessions (longer-term effect). A positive femoral slump test was identified as the predictor for the immediate treatment effect. The prediction factors for the longer-term effect included responding to femoral nerve mobilization the first time and a bilateral difference in hip extension angles. Application of the clinical predictors improved the success rate to 90% for 1 treatment session and 93% for 6 treatment sessions.
Clinicians could use the positive femoral slump test and a bilateral difference in hip extension angles during the femoral slump test to determine whether or not patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome might benefit from femoral nerve mobilization.
确定髌股疼痛综合征患者神经动力管理成功的预测因素。
前瞻性队列预测规则研究。
医院。
髌股疼痛综合征患者(N = 51)接受了临床检查和身体参数测量,包括股神经牵拉试验、下肢对线、柔韧性和肌肉力量以及功能水平。
患者在2周内接受6次股神经松动治疗。
在第一次和第六次治疗前后评估功能测试期间的疼痛水平。然后将患者分为反应者和无反应者组。反应者组的标准是疼痛评分降低≥50%或整体评定量表评分≥4。采用卡方检验和独立t检验确定显著性水平为0.10的潜在变量,并采用逐步逻辑回归分析确定显著性水平为0.05的预测因素。
25例患者对初始治疗有反应(即刻效应),28例患者在6次治疗后有反应(长期效应)。股神经牵拉试验阳性被确定为即刻治疗效果的预测因素。长期效应的预测因素包括首次对股神经松动有反应以及髋关节伸展角度的双侧差异。应用临床预测因素可使1次治疗的成功率提高到90%,6次治疗的成功率提高到93%。
临床医生可利用股神经牵拉试验阳性以及股神经牵拉试验期间髋关节伸展角度的双侧差异来确定髌股疼痛综合征患者是否可能从股神经松动中获益。