Wittayanukorn Saranrat, Qian Jingjing, Westrick Salisa C, Billor Nedret, Johnson Brandon, Hansen Richard A
Department of Health Outcomes Research and Policy, Auburn University Harrison School of Pharmacy, 020 James E Foy Hall, Auburn, AL 36849-5506, USA.
Auburn University, Harrison School of Pharmacy, USA.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2015 Sep-Oct;11(5):708-20. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2014.12.002. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
Despite the availability of previous studies, little research has examined how types of anti-neoplastic agents prescribed differ among various populations and health care characteristics in ambulatory settings, which is a primary method of providing care in the U.S. Understanding treatment patterns can help identify possible disparities and guide practice or policy change.
To characterize patterns of anti-neoplastic agents prescribed to breast cancer patients in ambulatory settings and identify factors associated with receipt of treatment.
A cross-sectional analysis using the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data in 2006-2010 was conducted. Breast cancer treatments were categorized by class and further grouped as chemotherapy, hormone, and targeted therapy. A visit-level descriptive analysis using visit sampling weights estimated national prescribing trends (n = 2746 breast cancer visits, weighted n = 28,920,657). Multiple logistic regression analyses identified factors associated with anti-neoplastic agent used.
The proportion of visits in which anti-neoplastic agent(s) was/were documented remained stable from 2006 to 2010 (20.47% vs. 24.56%; P > 0.05). Hormones were commonly prescribed (29.69%) followed by mitotic inhibitors (9.86%) and human epidermal growth factor receptor2 inhibitors (5.34%). Patients with distant stage were more likely than patients with in-situ stage to receive treatment (Adjusted Odds Ratio [OR] = 2.79; 95% CI, 1.04-7.77), particularly chemotherapy and targeted therapy. Patients with older age, being ethnic minorities, having comorbid depression, and having U.S. Medicaid insurance were less likely to receive targeted therapy (P < 0.05). Patients with older age, having comorbid obesity and osteoporosis were less likely to receive chemotherapy, while patients seen in hospital-based settings and settings located in metropolitan areas were more likely to receive chemotherapy (P < 0.05).
Anti-neoplastic treatment patterns differ among breast cancer patients treated in ambulatory settings. Factors predicting treatment include certain socio-demographics, cancer stages, comorbidities, metropolitan areas, and setting.
尽管已有先前的研究,但很少有研究探讨在门诊环境中,不同人群和医疗保健特征下开具的抗肿瘤药物类型有何差异,而门诊是美国提供医疗服务的主要方式。了解治疗模式有助于识别可能存在的差异,并指导实践或政策变革。
描述门诊环境中乳腺癌患者开具抗肿瘤药物的模式,并确定与接受治疗相关的因素。
使用2006 - 2010年国家门诊医疗保健调查数据进行横断面分析。乳腺癌治疗按类别分类,并进一步分为化疗、激素治疗和靶向治疗。使用就诊抽样权重进行就诊水平的描述性分析,估计全国处方趋势(n = 2746次乳腺癌就诊,加权n = 28,920,657)。多元逻辑回归分析确定与使用抗肿瘤药物相关的因素。
2006年至2010年,记录有抗肿瘤药物的就诊比例保持稳定(20.47%对24.56%;P > 0.05)。激素治疗是常用的(29.69%),其次是有丝分裂抑制剂(9.86%)和人表皮生长因子受体2抑制剂(5.34%)。远处期患者比原位期患者更有可能接受治疗(调整后的优势比[OR] = 2.79;95%可信区间,1.04 - 7.77),特别是化疗和靶向治疗。年龄较大、为少数族裔、患有合并抑郁症以及拥有美国医疗补助保险的患者接受靶向治疗的可能性较小(P < 0.05)。年龄较大、患有合并肥胖症和骨质疏松症的患者接受化疗的可能性较小,而在医院环境和大都市地区的医疗机构就诊的患者接受化疗的可能性较大(P < 0.05)。
门诊环境中接受治疗的乳腺癌患者的抗肿瘤治疗模式存在差异。预测治疗的因素包括某些社会人口统计学特征、癌症分期、合并症、大都市地区和医疗机构环境。