Shen Shu, Jiang Li, Xiao Guang-Qin, Yan Lu-Nan, Yang Jia-Yin, Wen Tian-Fu, Li Bo, Wang Wen-Tao, Xu Ming-Qing, Wei Yong-Gang
Shu Shen, Li Jiang, Guang-Qin Xiao, Lu-Nan Yan, Jia-Yin Yang, Tian-Fu Wen, Bo Li, Wen-Tao Wang, Ming-Qing Xu, Yong-Gang Wei, Liver Transplantation Center, Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China.
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan 14;21(2):584-92. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i2.584.
To evaluate the prophylactic efficacy of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) in combination with different nucleos(t)ide analogues.
A total of 5333 hepatitis B surface antigen-positive patients from the China Liver Transplant Registry database were enrolled between January 2000 and December 2009. Low-dose intramuscular (im) HBIG combined with one nucleos(t)ide analogue has been shown to be very cost-effective in recent reports. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) prophylactic outcomes were compared based on their posttransplant prophylactic protocols [group A (n = 4684): im HBIG plus lamivudine; group B (n = 491): im HBIG plus entecavir; group C (n = 158): im HBIG plus adefovir dipivoxil]. We compared the related baseline characteristics among the three groups, including the age, male sex, Meld score at the time of transplantation, Child-Pugh score at the time of transplantation, HCC, pre-transplantation hepatitis B e antigen positivity, pre-transplantation HBV deoxyribonucleic acid (HBV DNA) positivity, HBV DNA at the time of transplantation, pre-transplantation antiviral therapy, and the duration of antiviral therapy before transplantation of the patients. We also calculated the 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates and HBV recurrence rates according to the different groups. All potential risk factors were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses.
The mean follow-up duration was 42.1 ± 30.3 mo. The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were lower in group A than in groups B (86.2% vs 94.4%, 76.9% vs 86.6%, 73.7% vs 82.4%, respectively, P < 0.001) and C (86.2% vs 92.5%, 76.9% vs 73.7%, 87.0% vs 81.6%, respectively, P < 0.001). The 1-, 3- and 5-year posttransplant HBV recurrence rates were significantly higher in group A than in group B (1.7% vs 0.5%, 3.5% vs 1.5%, 4.7% vs 1.5%, respectively, P = 0.023). No significant difference existed between groups A and C and between groups B and C with respect to the 1-, 3- and 5-year HBV recurrence rates. Pretransplant hepatocellular carcinoma, high viral load and posttransplant prophylactic protocol (lamivudine and HBIG vs entecavir and HBIG) were associated with HBV recurrence.
Low-dose intramuscular HBIG in combination with a nucleos(t)ide analogue provides effective prophylaxis against posttransplant HBV recurrence, especially for HBIG plus entecavir.
评估乙型肝炎免疫球蛋白(HBIG)联合不同核苷(酸)类似物的预防效果。
选取2000年1月至2009年12月中国肝移植登记数据库中5333例乙型肝炎表面抗原阳性患者。近期报告显示,低剂量肌内注射HBIG联合一种核苷(酸)类似物具有很高的成本效益。根据移植后的预防方案比较乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)预防效果[ A组(n = 4684):肌内注射HBIG加拉米夫定;B组(n = 491):肌内注射HBIG加恩替卡韦;C组(n = 158):肌内注射HBIG加阿德福韦酯]。比较三组患者的相关基线特征,包括年龄、性别、移植时的Meld评分、移植时的Child-Pugh评分、肝癌、移植前乙肝e抗原阳性、移植前HBV脱氧核糖核酸(HBV DNA)阳性、移植时HBV DNA、移植前抗病毒治疗以及患者移植前抗病毒治疗的持续时间。我们还根据不同组计算了1年、3年和5年生存率以及HBV复发率。使用单因素和多因素分析对所有潜在风险因素进行分析。
平均随访时间为42.1±30.3个月。A组的1年、3年和5年生存率低于B组(分别为86.2%对94.4%、76.9%对86.6%、73.7%对82.4%,P<0.001)和C组(分别为86.2%对92.5%、76.9%对73.7%、87.0%对81.6%,P<0.001)。A组移植后1年、3年和5年的HBV复发率显著高于B组(分别为1.7%对0.5%、3.5%对1.5%、4.7%对1.5%,P = 0.023)。A组和C组之间以及B组和C组之间在1年、3年和5年HBV复发率方面无显著差异。移植前肝细胞癌、高病毒载量和移植后预防方案(拉米夫定和HBIG对恩替卡韦和HBIG)与HBV复发有关。
低剂量肌内注射HBIG联合核苷(酸)类似物可有效预防移植后HBV复发,尤其是HBIG加恩替卡韦。