Suppr超能文献

儿童重症肌无力的胸腺切除术:开放手术与胸腔镜手术方法的比较

Thymectomy for myasthenia gravis in children: a comparison of open and thoracoscopic approaches.

作者信息

Goldstein Seth D, Culbertson Nicholas T, Garrett Deiadra, Salazar Jose H, Van Arendonk Kyle, McIltrot Kimberly, Felix Michelle, Abdullah Fizan, Crawford Thomas, Colombani Paul

机构信息

Johns Hopkins Children's Center, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Baltimore MD, USA.

Johns Hopkins Children's Center, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Baltimore MD, USA.

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 2015 Jan;50(1):92-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.10.005. Epub 2014 Oct 30.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Thymectomy is an accepted component of treatment for myasthenia gravis (MG), but optimal timing and surgical approach have not been determined. Though small series have reported the feasibility of thoracoscopic resection, some studies have suggested that minimally invasive methods are suboptimal compared to open sternotomy owing to incomplete clearance of thymic tissue. Here we report the largest series of thymectomies for pediatric myasthenia gravis in the literature to date.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients undergoing thymectomy for MG between 1990 and 2013 in a tertiary referral hospital was performed. Twelve patients who underwent thoracoscopic thymectomy were compared to 16 patients who underwent open thymectomy via median sternotomy. Postoperative outcomes were determined by electronic chart review in consultation with the treating pediatric neurologist. Disease severities were graded according to a modified Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Quantitative MG (QMG) score.

RESULTS

Overall, thoracoscopic resections tended to be performed on patients with earlier and less severe disease than open surgeries. Inpatient length of stay was significantly shorter after thoracoscopic surgery (mean 1.8 vs 8.0 days, p=0.045). The preoperative and postoperative MGFA QMG scores were equivalent between the two groups. Both groups experienced a decrease in disease severity (p<0.001) after median follow-up time of 23 months in the thoracoscopic group and 44 months in the open group.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive thymectomy for MG in children has increased in popularity as surgeons and neurologists compare the risks and benefits of surgery against other therapies. This analysis suggests that thoracoscopic thymectomy is not inferior to median sternotomy in terms of disease control in this small series, and that the morbidity of the thoracoscopic approach appears sufficiently low to be considered for early stage disease. Low perioperative morbidity and shortened hospital course make thoracoscopic thymectomy an attractive option in centers with sufficient medical and surgical experience.

摘要

目的

胸腺切除术是重症肌无力(MG)治疗的公认组成部分,但最佳时机和手术方式尚未确定。尽管有小样本报道了胸腔镜切除术的可行性,但一些研究表明,与胸骨正中切开术相比,微创方法由于胸腺组织清除不完全而并非最佳选择。在此,我们报告了迄今为止文献中最大规模的小儿重症肌无力胸腺切除术系列研究。

方法

对一家三级转诊医院1990年至2013年间接受胸腺切除术治疗MG的患者进行回顾性研究。将12例行胸腔镜胸腺切除术的患者与16例行胸骨正中切开术开放性胸腺切除术的患者进行比较。术后结果通过与治疗小儿神经科医生协商进行电子病历审查确定。根据美国重症肌无力基金会(MGFA)改良的重症肌无力定量(QMG)评分对疾病严重程度进行分级。

结果

总体而言,与开放性手术相比,胸腔镜切除术倾向于在疾病较轻且病程较早的患者中进行。胸腔镜手术后住院时间明显缩短(平均1.8天对8.0天,p = 0.045)。两组术前和术后MGFA QMG评分相当。胸腔镜组中位随访23个月,开放组中位随访44个月后,两组疾病严重程度均有所降低(p < 0.001)。

结论

随着外科医生和神经科医生比较手术与其他治疗方法的风险和益处,小儿重症肌无力的微创胸腺切除术越来越受欢迎。该分析表明,在这个小系列研究中,就疾病控制而言,胸腔镜胸腺切除术并不逊色于胸骨正中切开术,而且胸腔镜手术方法的发病率似乎足够低,可考虑用于早期疾病。围手术期发病率低且住院时间缩短,使得胸腔镜胸腺切除术在有足够医疗和手术经验的中心成为一个有吸引力的选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验