Suppr超能文献

一项随机、三治疗组、三周期、六序列交叉、单中心生物等效性研究,旨在评估不同10毫克晶型对健康志愿者中乐伐替尼药代动力学的影响。

A randomized, three-treatment, three-period, six-sequence-crossover, single-center, bioequivalence study to evaluate the impact of different 10-mg crystalline forms on the pharmacokinetics of lenvatinib in healthy volunteers.

作者信息

Lee Lucy, D'Angelo Pina, Verbel David, Martinez Gresel, Aluri Jagadeesh, Brimhall Darin

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Feb;53(2):190-8. doi: 10.5414/CP202216.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the impact of varying lenvatinib crystalline forms in 10-mg lenvatinib capsules on drug bioavailability in healthy volunteers.

MATERIALS

Lenvatinib 10-mg capsules (low C and high C forms).

METHODS

This randomized, three-period- crossover study compared the pharmacokinetics and safety of two crystalline forms of capsules (low C-form, <4% crystalline; high C-form, 38% crystalline) to a standard (ref Cform, 15% crystalline).

RESULTS

59 subjects were evaluable for pharmacokinetics. Test/reference ratios of the geometric least squares means (LSM) and 90% confidence intervals (CI) for AUC0-t (t up to 120 hours), AUC0-∞, and Cmax for low C-form vs. ref C-form were 101 (94.8, 107), 101 (95.3, 107), and 98.7 (88.6, 110), respectively; and for high C-form vs. ref C-form were 96.0 (92.1, 100), 96.5 (92.5, 101), and 90.6 (83.5, 98.4), respectively. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were comparable between all formulations (TEAE range 20-24%; TRAE range 15-19%). One serious TRAE (spontaneous abortion) occurred in the low C-form group.

CONCLUSIONS

For both comparisons, the 90% CIs of the test/reference ratios were within the regulatory acceptance range (80-125%), suggesting that both test formulations (low Cform and high C-form) were bioequivalent to the reference formulation for Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了10毫克乐伐替尼胶囊中不同晶型对健康志愿者药物生物利用度的影响。

材料

10毫克乐伐替尼胶囊(低C型和高C型)。

方法

本随机、三周期交叉研究比较了两种晶型胶囊(低C型,结晶度<4%;高C型,结晶度38%)与标准品(参比C型,结晶度15%)的药代动力学和安全性。

结果

59名受试者可进行药代动力学评估。低C型与参比C型的AUC0-t(t至120小时)、AUC0-∞和Cmax的几何最小二乘均值(LSM)及90%置信区间(CI)的试验/参比比值分别为101(94.8,107)、101(95.3,107)和98.7(88.6,110);高C型与参比C型的分别为96.0(92.1,100)、96.5(92.5,101)和90.6(83.5,98.4)。所有制剂治疗期间出现的不良事件(TEAE)和治疗相关不良事件(TRAE)的发生率相当(TEAE范围20 - 24%;TRAE范围15 - 19%)。低C型组发生1例严重TRAE(自然流产)。

结论

对于两种比较,试验/参比比值的90%CI均在监管接受范围内(80 - 125%),表明两种试验制剂(低C型和高C型)在Cmax、AUC0-t和AUC0-∞方面与参比制剂生物等效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验