Elhadi Ali M, Hardesty Douglas A, Zaidi Hasan A, Kalani M Yashar S, Nakaji Peter, White William L, Preul Mark C, Little Andrew S
*Division of Neurological Surgery and ‡Division of Neurosurgery Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona.
Neurosurgery. 2015 Mar;11 Suppl 2:69-78; discussion 78-9. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000601.
Microscopic and endoscopic transsphenoidal approaches to the sellar are well established. Surgical freedom is an important skull base principle that can be measured objectively and used to compare approaches.
To compare the surgical freedom of 4 transsphenoidal approaches to the sella turcica to aid in surgical approach selection.
Four transsphenoidal approaches to the sella were performed on 8 silicon-injected cadaveric heads. Surgical freedom was determined with stereotactic image guidance using previously established techniques. The results are presented as the area of surgical freedom and angular surgical freedom (angle of attack) in the axial and sagittal planes.
Mean total exposed area surgical freedom for the microscopic sublabial, endoscopic binostril, endoscopic uninostril, and microscopic endonasal approaches were 102 ± 13, 89 ± 6, 81 ± 4, and 69 ± 10 cm2, respectively. The endoscopic binostril approach had the greatest surgical freedom at the pituitary gland and ipsilateral and contralateral internal carotid arteries (25.7 ± 5.4, 28.0 ± 4.0, and 23.0 ± 3.0 cm2) compared with the microscopic sublabial (21.8 ± 3.5, 21.3 ± 2.4, and 19.5 ± 6.3 cm2), microscopic endonasal (14.2 ± 2.7, 14.1 ± 3.2, and 16.3 ± 4.0 cm2), and endoscopic uninostril (19.7 ± 4.8, 22.4 ± 2.3, and 19.5 ± 2.9 cm2) approaches. Axial angle of attack was greatest for the microscopic sublabial approach to the same targets (14.7 ± 1.3°, 11.0 ± 1.5°, and 11.8 ± 1.1°). For the sagittal angle of attack, the endoscopic binostril approach was superior for all 3 targets (16.6 ± 1.7°, 17.2 ± 0.70°, and 15.5 ± 1.2°).
Microscopic sublabial and endoscopic binostril approaches provided superior surgical freedom compared with the endonasal microscopic and uninostril endoscopic approaches. This work provides objective baseline values for the quantification and evaluation of future refinements in surgical technique or instrumentation.
经蝶窦入路至蝶鞍的显微镜下和内镜下手术方法已得到充分确立。手术自由度是颅底手术的一项重要原则,可进行客观测量并用于比较不同手术入路。
比较4种经蝶窦入路至蝶鞍的手术自由度,以辅助手术入路的选择。
对8个注入硅的尸体头部进行4种经蝶窦入路至蝶鞍的手术。使用先前确立的技术,通过立体定向图像引导确定手术自由度。结果以手术自由度面积和轴向及矢状面的角向手术自由度(攻击角度)表示。
显微镜下单唇下入路、内镜双侧鼻孔入路、内镜单侧鼻孔入路和显微镜下鼻内入路的平均总暴露面积手术自由度分别为102±13、89±6、81±4和69±10cm²。与显微镜下单唇下入路(21.8±3.5、21.3±2.4和19.5±6.3cm²)、显微镜下鼻内入路(14.2±2.7、14.1±3.2和16.3±4.0cm²)以及内镜单侧鼻孔入路(19.7±4.8、22.4±2.3和19.5±2.9cm²)相比,内镜双侧鼻孔入路在垂体、同侧和对侧颈内动脉处具有最大的手术自由度(25.7±5.4、28.0±4.0和23.0±3.0cm²)。对于相同目标,显微镜下单唇下入路的轴向攻击角度最大(14.7±1.3°、11.0±1.5°和11.8±1.1°)。对于矢状面攻击角度,内镜双侧鼻孔入路在所有3个目标上均更具优势(16.6±1.7°、17.2±0.70°和15.5±1.2°)。
与鼻内显微镜下和单侧鼻孔内镜入路相比,显微镜下单唇下入路和内镜双侧鼻孔入路提供了更好的手术自由度。这项工作为量化和评估未来手术技术或器械的改进提供了客观的基线值。