Magnusson Brianna M, Eggett Dennis, Mumford Kyle, Collingwood Scott C, Bernhardt Scott A
Department of Health Sciences, Brigham Young University.
J Environ Health. 2014 Oct;77(3):22-8.
Handheld temperature and relative humidity (T/RH) meters are commonly used in residential indoor air surveys. Although popular, T/RH meters are prone to sensor drift and consequent loss of accuracy, and thus instrument manufacturers often recommend annual calibration and adjustment. Field-use conditions, however, have been shown to accelerate electronic sensor drift in outdoor applications, resulting in out-of-tolerance measurements in less than one year. In the study described in this article, sensor drift was evaluated under residential field use for 30 handheld T/RH meters to predict needed calibration intervals based on hierarchical linear modeling. Instruments were used in 43 home visits over a 93-day period and were calibrated (without adjustment) 49 times over the study period with a laboratory standard. Analysis of covariance showed significant drift among temperature sensors for all three instrument types (p < .0001) and among humidity sensors in two instruments. The authors' study suggests calibration frequency should be based on instrument performance under specific sampling conditions rather than on predetermined time intervals.
手持式温度和相对湿度(T/RH)测量仪常用于住宅室内空气调查。尽管T/RH测量仪很受欢迎,但它们容易出现传感器漂移并因此失去准确性,所以仪器制造商通常建议每年进行校准和调整。然而,已有研究表明,现场使用条件会加速户外应用中电子传感器的漂移,导致在不到一年的时间内测量结果超出公差范围。在本文所述的研究中,对30台手持式T/RH测量仪在住宅现场使用情况下的传感器漂移进行了评估,以基于分层线性模型预测所需的校准间隔。在93天的时间里,这些仪器用于43次家访,并在研究期间使用实验室标准进行了49次校准(无调整)。协方差分析表明,所有三种仪器类型的温度传感器之间均存在显著漂移(p <.0001),两种仪器的湿度传感器之间也存在显著漂移。作者的研究表明,校准频率应基于特定采样条件下的仪器性能,而不是预定的时间间隔。