De Urioste-Stone Sandra M, Pennington Pamela M, Pellecer Elizabeth, Aguilar Teresa M, Samayoa Gabriela, Perdomo Hugo D, Enríquez Hugo, Juárez José G
Centro de Estudios en Salud, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala 01015, Guatemala.
Centro de Estudios en Salud, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala 01015, Guatemala
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Feb;109(2):159-67. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/tru202.
Integrated vector management strategies depend on local eco-bio-social conditions, community participation, political will and inter-sectorial partnership. Previously identified risk factors for persistent Triatoma dimidiata infestation include the presence of rodents and chickens, tiled roofs, dirt floors, partial wall plastering and dog density.
A community-based intervention was developed and implemented based on cyclical stakeholder and situational analyses. Intervention implementation and evaluation combined participatory action research and cluster randomized pre-test post-test experimental designs. The intervention included modified insecticide application, education regarding Chagas disease and risk factors, and participatory rodent control.
At final evaluation there was no significant difference in post-test triatomine infestation between intervention and control, keeping pre-test rodent and triatomine infestations constant. Knowledge levels regarding Chagas disease and prevention practices including rodent control, chicken management and health service access increased significantly only in intervention communities. The odds of nymph infection and rat infestation were 8.3 and 1.9-fold higher in control compared to intervention communities, respectively.
Vector control measures without reservoir control are insufficient to reduce transmission risk in areas with persistent triatomine infestation. This integrated vector management program can complement house improvement initiatives by prioritizing households with risk factors such as tiled roofs. Requirement for active participation and multi-sectorial coordination poses implementation challenges.
综合病媒管理策略取决于当地的生态-生物-社会条件、社区参与、政治意愿和部门间伙伴关系。先前确定的持续存在的二点锥猎蝽侵扰的风险因素包括啮齿动物和鸡的存在、瓷砖屋顶、泥土地面、部分墙面抹灰以及犬类密度。
基于周期性的利益相关者和情境分析,制定并实施了一项基于社区的干预措施。干预措施的实施和评估结合了参与式行动研究和整群随机前后测实验设计。干预措施包括改良杀虫剂应用、关于恰加斯病和风险因素的教育以及参与式啮齿动物控制。
在最终评估中,干预组和对照组在测试后的锥猎蝽侵扰情况没有显著差异,保持了测试前啮齿动物和锥猎蝽侵扰情况不变。仅在干预社区,关于恰加斯病以及包括啮齿动物控制、鸡的管理和获得卫生服务等预防措施的知识水平显著提高。与干预社区相比,对照组若虫感染和鼠患的几率分别高出8.3倍和1.9倍。
在存在持续锥猎蝽侵扰的地区,没有宿主控制的病媒控制措施不足以降低传播风险。这种综合病媒管理计划可以通过优先考虑有瓷砖屋顶等风险因素的家庭来补充房屋改善举措。积极参与和多部门协调的要求带来了实施挑战。