Suppr超能文献

外用环孢素与乳剂载体治疗脆甲症:一项随机对照试验性研究。

Topical cyclosporine versus emulsion vehicle for the treatment of brittle nails: a randomized controlled pilot study.

作者信息

Mackay-Wiggan Julian, Marji Jackleen, Walt John G, Campbell Angela, Coppola Carol, Chakraborty Bibhas, Hollander David A, Whitcup Scott M

出版信息

J Drugs Dermatol. 2014 Oct;13(10):1232-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Limited options are available for the treatment of brittle nail syndrome.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of topical cyclosporine emulsion (CsAE) versus emulsion (vehicle) alone in the treatment of brittle nail syndrome.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were randomized to topical CsAE emulsion or emulsion (vehicle) for 24 weeks. Four fingernails of each patient were included; the 2 most severe brittle nails and the second most normal nail were treated with the same medication. The fourth nail, the most normal nail, remained untreated and was used to assess nail growth. The prespecified primary endpoint was change from baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) score (0 to 5 scale) at each follow-up visit. Safety evaluations were conducted at each visit.

RESULTS

In the intent-to-treat population (n=12 for each treatment arm), the PGA score for treated nails improved from baseline (CsAE, 0.7 to 1.4; emulsion, 0.7 to 1.5; P<0.05 for each), with no significant between-group differences. Untreated nails did not improve in overall appearance (0.0 to 0.3 grade; P>0.05). Statistically and clinically significant improvement from baseline was reported for nail length/appearance in both CsAE and vehicle groups.

LIMITATIONS

Sample size was relatively small. The difference in PGA between treated and untreated nails was not analyzed. Baseline disease severity may have been too mild, limiting detection of efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Both CsAE and emulsion vehicle applied topically appeared to improve signs and symptoms of brittle nail syndrome and were well tolerated. These findings warrant corroboration in a larger population and inclusion of comparison with an inactive control and a higher concentration of CsAE, the former which may help in distinguishing the efficacy of vehicle emulsion from CsAE.

摘要

背景

治疗脆甲综合征的选择有限。

目的

评估外用环孢素乳剂(CsAE)与单纯乳剂(赋形剂)治疗脆甲综合征的疗效和安全性。

结果

24例患者被随机分为外用CsAE乳剂组或乳剂(赋形剂)组,治疗24周。纳入每位患者的4个指甲;将2个最严重的脆甲和第二正常的指甲用相同药物治疗。第4个指甲,即最正常的指甲,不进行治疗,用于评估指甲生长情况。预先设定的主要终点是每次随访时医生整体评估(PGA)评分(0至5分制)相对于基线的变化。每次随访时进行安全性评估。

结果

在意向性治疗人群中(每个治疗组n = 12),治疗指甲的PGA评分相对于基线有所改善(CsAE组,从0.7改善至1.4;乳剂组,从0.7改善至1.5;每组P<0.05),组间差异无统计学意义。未治疗的指甲整体外观没有改善(0.0至0.3级;P>0.05)。CsAE组和赋形剂组的指甲长度/外观相对于基线均有统计学和临床意义的改善。

局限性

样本量相对较小。未分析治疗指甲与未治疗指甲之间PGA的差异。基线疾病严重程度可能过轻,限制了疗效的检测。

结论

外用CsAE和乳剂赋形剂似乎均可改善脆甲综合征的体征和症状,且耐受性良好。这些发现值得在更大规模人群中进行验证,并纳入与无活性对照以及更高浓度CsAE的比较,前者可能有助于区分赋形剂乳剂与CsAE的疗效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验